PrivacyWayFinder

joined 8 months ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
&udm=14 | Distraction-free Google Search! in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you are stubborn on using google search then this could help ig; https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&hl=en&safe=off&filter=0&pws=0&gl=us&num=30

\n\n\n in c/[email protected]
\n\n\n in c/[email protected]
\n\n\n in c/[email protected]
19
\n\n\n (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20272721

I don't remember exact lines but it goes like this: "It's not the pain that makes man suffer, it's the meaningless suffering makes unbearable." I think this was the end card quote probably stated by NIETZSCHE. Based on the quote I am guessing it should be something of psychological thriller or war type, but the quote stuck in my mind rather than movie name. So I hoping that someone could end my suffering on thinking about that movie title.

DuckDuckGo starting to give more "personal" search results in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Search query with possible parameters included from their website.

Privacy-friendly whatsapp in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I am using Launch Chat. As it got more other messenger apps(Telegram, Signal). So far so good, chat with people without allowing contacts permission to messengers like whatsapp.

Session vs simplex or other alternatives? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Session don't have forward secrecy. For more comparison check out this Spreadsheet.

Inside the Biggest FBI Sting Operation in History in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Can't wait to watch the film....lol

What's the best messaging platform? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

SimpleX

Does VPNs even work against Big Brother apps? Using one really protects our privacy? (masking our location) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Thank you for enlightening me.

Does VPNs even work against Big Brother apps? Using one really protects our privacy? (masking our location) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Thank you.

Does VPNs even work against Big Brother apps? Using one really protects our privacy? (masking our location) in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Phone

64
Does VPNs even work against Big Brother apps? Using one really protects our privacy? (masking our location) (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
32 comments fedilink
 

I am currently using Proton VPN (free tier) which is set to Always-ON and Block Connections on disable.

Today while I am going through my Gmail security option, on the devices/sessions I found my real location mentioned over there. Even when I use desktop I always connect to VPN.

On this issue I got couple of doubts:

  • Is this because I am using a free tier VPN? so it's not functioning properly etc...
  • Else google fixed my location based on my previous location history? I used my google applications without VPN for many years, I am just learning & following privacy tips recently.
1
Why every TOTP app default uses SHA-1 hash encryption? (lemmy.world)
 

I use Aegis as my 2fa. Today on new token creation I observed that there's hash function set to SHA-1, later checked all my tokens and the result is same type of encryption used for all. So I have edited all my tokens to SHA-256 as a result my totp doesn't authenticate. Do I have to rescan my tokens for updating to SHA-256 or it doesn't work like that?

Security: SHA-1 < SHA-256 < SHA-512

Speed: SHA-1 > SHA-256 > SHA-512

My doubts are: Why can't we use SHA-256? Is it because TOTP requires less time so faster one(SHA-1) is chosen? Can we use SHA-256 for TOTPs?

view more: next ›