PhobosAnomaly

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Awesome, thanks for taking the time to reply to my facetious comment! Norn Iron is just Northern Ireland said in a Northern Irish accent.

Fingers crossed for a mobile port!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Fuck Wales and Norn Iron, I guess? ๐Ÿ˜‚

I wonder if this will get a mobile port. It looks like something I could burn off a few lunch breaks with, but not necessarily sit and play on a big screen. That's a subjective thing though I guess.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I didn't even know it was British. Fuck's sake.

Orbex looks promising, but any space firm is only one shit launch away from bankruptcy it seems.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Some of them may be hardware related - any time I sign in to one of my TCL TV's with a Premium account, the first result in any search is always one marked Sponsored. It's gash, but it doesn't happen on any other of my devices than that TCL TV which makes me think it's some sort of vendor problem.

Either way, YouTube/Google/Alphabet/whoever won't give a fuck so if it's that bad, then vote with your wallet.

[โ€“] [email protected] 119 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Is that a picture of a tweet of a printout of a MS Notepad file that was probably cut and pasted from a forwarded email, newsgroup post, or web page?

my head hurts

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm just freestyling here and I'm sure someone with a professional experience or academic background in psychology can tear it up for arsepaper, but I wonder if it's an innate fear?

Like the uncanny valley with autonomous human-style robots or how AI generated pictures of faces are sending primitive recognition patterns haywire, I wonder if covering up half of the visual cues to recognise someone as friend or foe provokes an in-built negative reaction?

I mean, it's not rational, but then chucklefucks who complain about it don't do rational even if it's in their interest.

[โ€“] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

$ undelete spankmonkey

$ chmod 0 dtrump

$ 10 PRINT "DONGS"

$ 20 GOTO 10

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Absolutely agree with you - I think perhaps Kamala was too safe a pair of hands and didn't generate enough excitement - but then I'm too old for watching fancy headline grabbers (though Ed Davey's approach to Lib Dem vote grabbing at the GE this year was highly entertaining) so to me, a boring but competent candidate is good for me.

I suppose I only brough up her gender and his sexuality because they both share an "outlier" characteristic that Republicans in general aren't too fond of.

Nice to hear from you fellow Brit!

[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

auto-gay

Sounds like a really bad transformers opponent.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Speaking from across the pond, I think Pete would have been brilliant... but then that's hardly part of the job description any more is it? A breeze block with the ability to talk shit and grift would unfortunately be a far more electable candidate this year.

Plus, if electing a woman was too troublesome for people to handle, what would happen if they fielded one of the gays!!!?!??

It's a disgrace really. Either Pete or Kamala would have been a safe pair of hands.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ