Mihies

China has been investing heavily in green energy solutions for quite a while, it's not strange that they are seeing benefits.

Just read this "Spain cancels multimillion ammunition deal with Israel following media leak". ShOCKEd!

You'd think so, eh. Here, a headline: "Macron calls to halt arms deliveries to Israel in Gaza war" dated 6 October 2024. Then there is Italy which is still honoring pre-oct-7 deals and god knows how much traffic goes unnoticed. But it's not just enabling them, even ignoring the horrors by watching the other way or even sympathizing with Israel, is helping them. As per US is really the big one - yes, and they have a weapons supply for decades to come. Germany is not that small as well.

Especially Germany is managing to be on wrong side of genocide, again.

Yes, why not? But realistically we could stop enabling them, isolate them, sanction them. These are three ways Israel would really feel hard. But who am I kidding that such thing might happen, right? Because, apparently, West is happy with genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity happening as long as they are committed by our friends.

Edit: grammar

I'm sure Israel is devastated by this condemnation. /s But of course we won't actually do anything else.

Thanks, guys. That's really weird at best 😵‍💫

Can somebody elaborate on what the problems are?

Western tanks are built to protect the crew, while Soviet/Russian are built to advance regardless of anything without much consideration about crew safety (typical Soviet mentality). The turret throw is due to the shells being stored right under the crew, beneath the turret, and when those detonate (which is quite easy with modern anti tank weapons), everything is thrown magnificently into the air. Crew has no way to survive. It's different with western tanks, where shells are stored more safely and such a hit usually doesn't evaporate the crew.

They also throw their turrets much better when hit.

They might work, but then one is bound to be online. Also different computers might have different configurations and that is something to pay attention to as well. Alternative is a synchronisation to source (nextcloud sounds a good fit) but then you might bump to synchronisation conflicts and such. Both ways will produce a lot of traffic unless you redirect creation of build artifacts to a local directory. Which might not be always possible.

But does it mean they own Linux? They list (support I guess) a lot of projects, including RISC-V. BTW smart move from RISC-V