Lionheadbud

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

We invaded Jerusalem in 1917 on behalf of lord Rothschild and continue to protect his colony

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Should Israel be allowed to compete?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It's despicable how they've tried to shut down criticism of Israel's mass murder by dishing out permabans

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lots of people seem to be reporting permabans for comments involving Israel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I got banned for criticising Israel too

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Luckily I can buy a perfectly decent mouse that lasts forever for £5

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Is it incredibly easy to charge people with felonies?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I was kicked off Reddit for criticism of Israel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

And the amount of aspartame has doubled

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Of course the amount of sugar they consume from soft drinks will decrease if they've changed all the soft drinks to contain aspartame instead of sugar.

The question is does this actually improve people's health?

There are lots of suggestions that artificial sweeteners are harmful to health in their own ways

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/artificial-sweeteners-and-weight-gain#:~:text=Several%20observational%20studies%20on%20artificial,than%20weight%20loss%20(%2016%20).

And the evidence they reduce weight compared to sugar is not clear cut.

This seems like a study designed to make the sugar tax seem like a good thing, but it misses the crucial point, which is whether this improves health.

They've failed to mention that the decrease in sugar consumption will correspond with an increase in aspartame consumption

view more: next ›