"When they finally dragged the ‘corpse’ out they realised the blunder. The officers had a big laugh about it. It was a very dirty, broken and overused sex doll.”
Um, ewww?
Planted three paw paw saplings this spring and it looks like they're going to make it. If all goes well, I'll have fruit to share in ten years or so!
That's what I get for trying to ID a tree on my phone. Glad you figured it out, though!
It's a birch, I think a European white birch. It shouldn't be losing leaves this early. Look closely at the bark and see if you see a series of holes. If so, it's infested with Birch borers, and the tree is probably a goner. With all of that being said, the best thing the homeowner can do is hire a certified arborist to evaluate the tree.
Yeah. I'm sure most will just shift over to the MLS squad. I hate to imagine if the same thing happened to my club.
To be fair, Indiana basically is Florida, just minus a few alligators.
That's always a possibility. I get the feeling that there's strong interest in some of the ownership groups, and the "unnamed source" specifically said that the vote isn't dead, just delayed. I'm still hopeful it will happen.
Sounds like clubs wanted more clarification on what exactly they were voting on, which is a good sign. I'm glad to see they're doing their due diligence before moving forward, regardless of which way the vote goes.
Dammit, first unique post on this sub and it had to be about the creek puppies beating Le Rouge?!
Seriously, good game. You guys are really tough this season.
a big part of the hesitation is exponentially increased cost as travel moves from small regional “bus” leagues to more frequent long distance travel.
I think that can be addressed by profit sharing from the league. One of the things I learned from "Welcome to Wrexham" (which of course makes me fully qualified to be a club manager), when you're promoted in the English system, your club gets a higher "allowance" which you can use to offset higher salaries, travel costs, etc. I'm not sure where that income comes from (TV revenue, maybe?), and clearly the USL isn't making squat from it's current deal, but in the future that might be a way to help the smaller clubs handle the higher expenses.
if Madison moved up, they wouldn’t be able to increase attendance much without a bigger venue
Even the popular clubs like Forward Madison don't sell out every game, so you have to figure there's room for improvement in attendance and moving up would attract new/casual fans. Look at Cincinnati or Nashville as examples. They drew good crowds in the USL days, but really got big crowds when they moved up to MLS. Detroit has had consistently larger crowds since moving up from NISA, and that's without a change in venue.
That being said, I think every club should be looking to improve their housing situation until they have their own, high quality SSS. As much as I dislike MLS, I give them credit for their stadium requirements, and have to admit I'm jealous of some of their facilities. I love Keyworth, but would also love to see DCFC build their own place with some of the charms of the old stadiums.
So the TLDR response is I agree there would be major hurdles, but in the long run I think it can work. It'll be interesting to see how the vote goes.
Traverse City, up at the tip of the Lower Peninsula, holds a Cherry Fest every year and also produces some of the best wine in the country. The Great Lakes (Lake Michigan in particular) help to moderate temperatures, and we get a good amount of precipitation every year. Our cherries and apples are outstanding.
source: born and raised Michigander
One of the first shops to unionize was on Main Street in downtown Ann Arbor, Michigan. Starbucks recently announced a number of closings and surprisingly enough, that shop is one of the stores being closed. Corporate swears the closing has nothing to do with the union.
Apparently a shop operating successfully for over 20 years in a high visibility, heavy foot trafficked area of a college town is just a recipe for failure.