LGTM

joined 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I wonder if such a situation could occur if we were in some huge medium where Cherenkov radiation could occur

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Hmmmm, I guess that the premise was probably wrong then, since the object necessarily has to have mass and travel slower than c (I mean, a massless object would be constrained the by c anyways). The gravitational lensing is a good addition! I have no idea how I forgot, but I remember a hs physics class where this came up for new telescope images

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I always just used my left hand with the thumb and pinky as the y and x axes respectively, then the in-between fingers just help me visualize which "point" is higher (we only have two options to choose from if they're not equal anyways)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Absolutely agree, lowk a programmer must've done it else I don't think I've met a mathmematician (or maybe, not crazy enough ones) that ever preferred redefining variables (esp in pedagogical material!!!!)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What do you want to learn PDEs for? It's not my strong point, but I've heard high praise for Partial Differential Equations by Stanley J. Farlow. I found it useful in my undergrad, else I think I could have died in analytical mechanics

view more: ‹ prev next ›