JWBananas
I guess he really did have trouble remembering last week's puzzler.
Kira = John Wick. You try to leave the life behind, but the ~~streets~~ Guls keep calling.
Out-of-universe, it probably wouldn't work well for center of mass with respect to the direction of vision.
In-universe...
You're doing great. I'm proud of you.
Clearly if you turn the image upside-down, it is a Whale-Gnome-Dustbuster-Pharaoh in the architectural style of the Goa'uld/Ancient Ancients with a blowhole-mouth surprise.
But I'm leaning toward Dustbuster, now that we know it's Hoovering up ships.
Picardi B can't hurt you, they aren't real.
Rom U. Laren
I feel compelled to point out this important bit of context for anyone who doesn't read the paper:
Overall, based on the four environmental indicators used in this study, home-washed reusable nappies have the potential for the least environmental impact if washed in a water-efficient frontloading washing machine in cold water, and line-dried.
The UK study similarly found that colder water and line-drying would sufficiently reduce the carbon footprint to a lower level than disposables.
But seriously? Who does that?
For regular clothing, where you can use a more powerful detergent? Sure.
But for something that goes directly against your child's most sensitive skin, which will need to be laundered with gentle detergent?
Maybe we can find a paper on how to do all that without heat but with proper sanitation? Remember, laundry detergent is designed to clean, but not necessarily to sanitize.
That's more of Brother doing things correctly. Mine automatically shows up on all my Windows systems too.