Doesn't making political donations destroy any shred of impartiality the media once had?
Ixoid
joined 1 year ago
Herr Spud has said that SMRs are what the coalition policy is dependent on (despite the fact that there are zero SMRs generating consumer power anywhere in the world today). Maybe that's why The Guardian references this design, not whatever it is you're banging on about...
Counterpoint: faith and religion have caused more wars, misery, and death than any other single source in human history. We've had literally thousands of years of being led by religious leaders, maybe it's time to try something different. The world needs LESS faith.
Genocide is a good deed now? How curious.
Their religion has been telling them they're the "chosen ones" for thousands of years. Entitlement and victimhood are second nature.
Look, I started reading this article. Four paragraphs in I realised that I don't care.
Yeah, it's ambiguous, but they're referring to two months travel time.
This is the bare fucking minimum. Why have rules if they can be arbitrarily broken by some players?
"Infamous" - that means more than famous!
Spud's goal isn't to make life better for the average Australian. All the listed negatives are positives for the LNP - make the rich richer, and the poor poorer. Luckily, he's thick as shit and the average Australian can see what a terrible idea it is to spend your future.
Not American, so I don't really know the biases involved. But it seems super sketchy to me.