ItsMeSpez

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Hey, me either, but telling someone "you don't like it? Open your own laundromat or shut up" is some stupid shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They would have very little reason to invade taiwan at that point. So they probably wouldn’t.

Not about actually needing a reason to invade, it's about the implication

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Just don't be poor you fuckin' loser

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The number of math epiphanies I've had on youtube is way too high. Good math teachers are a rare breed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

You only think that because you're not a criminal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

As much as I believe it is a breeding ground for right wing extremism, it's a little strange that 4chan is being lumped in with these other sites for a suit like this. As far as I know, 4chan just promotes topics based on the number of people posting to it, and otherwise doesn't employ an algorithm at all. Kind of a different beast to the others, who have active algorithms trying to drive engagement at any cost.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The reason waste isn't being brought up is because modern designs do not produce nearly as much waste, and much safer waste, than previous technologies. Breeder reactors are able to produce more fissile material than they consume, and produce only waste products that have short half lives (less than 100 years). This is a long time from human perspectives, but it means that we do not have to design functionally indefinite storage for these materials any longer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Shout out to oat milk. The best substitute milk in general, but the absolute star for substitutions in baking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Did the article get edited or something? It's saying that he won by 87% to me.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 months ago

They do know this. They're avoiding any legal exposure by being vague.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

It says in the article they employed a commercial data set that is not composed of widely available public data in creating this app. Also, it lists a lot more information about people than whether or not they are christians.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So long as they save more on the planes than they spend on the lawsuits it's a win according to investors.

view more: next ›