HauntingScience

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It is not free. You pay with your email address AND phone number.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m sure you liked it, as I’m sure a bunch of people legitimately did.

What I’m saying is that I think most people saw Fury Road because of societal pressure due to a very small minority propping up the movie. I went to see it and found the movie to be an incredibly unsatisfying story about a FEDEX delivery that ended in the starting point. Useless.

I thought I was crazy reading so many people liked it, but now this gives support to my personal opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This gives credence to my mental canon that Fury Road wasn’t that really well liked and just a product of an extremely heavy campaign by a very small minority of people that liked it. If not, why not come for what could be considered the sequel?

At least for me, Fury Road was the first and last Mad Max film I’ll see.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

“You can’t expect pears out of an elm tree” or “No le pidas peras al olmo”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Nice try, Nintendo.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I’ve had some level of success using “gluetun” as the host of the container you want to hit, for any container outside of gluetun’s network mode.

Then, for those that are sharing the gluetun network, they can communicate using their regular hostname but using the internal port instead of the published one.

Out of all my containers behind gluetun I have only one that hasn’t been able to connect with anything but IPs

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

He’s starting his career as a future Republican presidential candidate early in life. He’s an overachiever 🥹🥹

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I yield. Thanks for the information!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I’m sorry my response came out pedantic, it was not my intention. But I stand by my comment. Asbestos hasn’t been fully banned in USA.

Notice how much work the “new uses” is doing in that sentence.

Some articles on it:

Even though asbestos is known to cause deadly diseases, the U.S. still allows companies to import hundreds of tons of the raw mineral. It is primarily used by two chemical manufacturers, OxyChem and Olin Corp., in the production of chlorine

The EPA has missed some legislative deadlines to enact the ban but says it will finalize the regulation by October.

(Deadline they missed, again)

https://www.propublica.org/article/asbestos-ban-poisoning-workers-factories

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Well, asbestos are not banned and they are actually pretty toughly regulated. So maybe find a better analogy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

That’s what taxes are for. Tax the sh*t out of cigarettes to account for the increased public health spending. Banning a substance is not the only, neither the best, solution to addiction.

view more: next ›