FourPacketsOfPeanuts

Doesn't pass the test for "reasonable doubt" ;)

Nice try lol, non-sexualised nudity is not illegal. UK law has a degree of common sense about it. A stick figure, even mildly sexualised, is unlikely to pass the test for indecency. Having said that, if someone drew some sort of extreme circumstance then, I don't know for sure, but I can imagine someone getting into shit about it.

Any sexual representation of a child is illegal in the UK whether it looks real or not. In fact I believe it doesn't need to even be a child, it's a illegal if a reasonable person would believe it was depicting a child. This came up when adults who were into age play got into trouble distributing their images because it looked convincingly underage.

Bound to be tested in court sooner or later. As far as I understand it one is "in possession" if they have access to a set of steps or procedures that would recover an image. So this prevents offenders from hiding behind the fact their images were compressed in a zip file or something. They don't have a literal offending image, but they possess it in a form that they can transform.

What would need to be tested is that AI generators are coming up with novel images rather than retrieving existing ones. It seems like common sense but the law is quite pedantic. The more significant issue is that generators don't need to be trained on csem to come up with it. So proving someone had it with the intent of producing it would always be hard. Even generators trained on illegal material I'm not sure it would be straight forward to prove that someone knew what it was capable of.

A good article that includes symbol resolution in context

https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6463

Holy crap there was someone inside that thing? How was their spine not destroyed on impact?

Heretic. True believers know it was 8 seconds ago.

Would have been nice if the question mentioned the US then...

sips tea

The cab was stationary at the time which I suppose made them think it wasn't a bump in the road or anything. Strange for a car window to spontaneously shatter without a jolt but I guess it happens.

The Sun dredging this up after six years? Classy reporting.

Presumably to call it an "incendiary device" there's a little more to it than a regular battery with a fault. A circuit designed to heat perhaps or some other clear trigger.

I'm not talking about inheritance though. I'm talking about when a farm takes on a family member as the new management. Because that's literally nepotism.

(Without getting too much into semantics, isn't headhunting a new boss at a company a type of nepotism? As in, there wasn't a competitive process, they were hand-picked by the board / CEO. Is "nepotism" only meant specifically where someone's incompetence is overlooked because of family relationship? If they're actually the best person for the job is that still nepotism?)