FarFarAway

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

This is an issue at Atlanta's airport as well.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

it doesn’t come at anyone’s expense’.

Seriously?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You have a point. I sometimes definitely forget to consider the flip side of the coin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not at all. Back to that educating the public bit.

I'm not a tech wiz, but I do know my way around basic functions of a computer. If i have no* idea how it works or what it's capable of, how are people who know next to nothing supposed to figure it out?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well, shit. This explains a lot. But also, what chucklehead thought that was a good idea.

I know, now that you mention it, I vaguely remember something about how they didn't think it should be kept only by some corps or something. Which is commendable but at the same time, ugh.

I have no problem with everyone being able to use it ,but there should have been an introductory period, if nothing else. Jeeze.

Whelp, fake everything here we...are.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the nice compainon blog explanation.

the whole situation makes more sense.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (16 children)

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but I feel like anything produced by AI should be somehow watermarked at the source. At this point there's only a handful of companies. It wouldn't be too hard to have them all insert something into the final product that is easily identifiable. Something like a microscopic signature in a corner, with model info and date produced...idk. Not anything that ruins the image, but something that can be seen by anyone, if looked for.

If nothing else there should be a large push to inform the public of telltale features to look for (i.e. too many appendages) to help them determine if it's created by AI or not. While not fool proof, if it can discount even a portion of the misinformation, imo, it's worth an effort.

To me, it seems irresponsible of the companies running the AI to just unleash it upon the world without training us humans to understand what we're looking at. Letting us see how realistic everything is while letting us know its been produced by AI, at least helps us to comprehend the scope of the matter and adapt to the situation at hand. Esp for those who don't fully grasp what AI can and cannot do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Umm... I resent you calling him president drink bleach.

He's president inject bleach.

Get it right, you Demorat!

Erm. /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Which part is untrue? Didn't they change the rules of bankruptcy like a decade ago or something?

It used to be that you could get all your loans discharged and in essence just end up with a really bad credit score. I thought they changed it so people still had to pay their debts off even if they declared bankruptcy.

Unsure if it applied to corporations though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

My rotty and my lhasa used to do this. The lhasa would get really mad and yell, if the rotty didn't feel like making out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Apparently Bangor maine has a big outdoor backyard, is probably relatively cheaper than other places along the east coast and is supposedly pretty lbgtq friendly.

Although that is not south of Maryland. Nevemind.

view more: ‹ prev next ›