Deely

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Thats actyally very good point. Our phones x100 or x10K more powerful and complex than computers from 90s, but always works and very-very rarely need reboot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Main issue (as mentioned at HN) - no clear licensing or sorting by licensing. Some icons (such as Amazon) are not permitted to use by third parties. HN thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36837442

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I understand you point of view, but honestly it will be good to have possibility to quickly check 'commit successor in a graph view from a phone.". I'm working with quite legacy systems (15-20yo) and sometimes, when I have some ideas about resolving some issues it will be good to quickly check backward and forward histories of commits around to verify something..

Thats not a dealbraker at all but it will be nice to have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most of the visualization problems are solved by a decent desktop client.

From article:

I am told that Git users commonly install third-party graphical viewers for Git, many of which do a better job of showing recent activity on the project. That is great, but these are still more third-party applications that must be installed and managed separately. Many are platform-specific. (One of the better ones, GitUp, only works on Mac, for example.) All require that you first sync your local repository then bring up their graphical interface on your desktop. And even with all that, I still cannot see what I typically want to see without multiple clicks. Checking on project status from a phone while away from the office is not an option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Like just now? Why both?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It make sense in any project that created by more than one person I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So thats why Kagi search relatively pricy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. All the same. Create lazy metric - get lazy and useless results.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Judging by quality of Google search results I believe experienced devs have the same problems with Google as well..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I suppose they can add source URL of information, so, you can verify correctness. But then I don't get it why we need lying AI if we can get URL in the first place. So, it will work just like any other good search engine.

Sorry if I sound salty, but I still don't get why companies put fake AI engines everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly I still don't get it. Every dialog with ChatGPT where I tried to do something meaningful always ends with ChatGPT hallucinations. It answers general questions, but it imagine something everytime. I asks for a list of command line renderers, it returns list with a few renderers that do not have CLI interface. I asks about library that do something, it returns 5 libraries with one library that definitely can't do it. And so on, so on. ChatGPT is good on trivial task, but I don't need help with trivial task, I can do trivial task myself... Sorry for a rant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want to add that ChatGPT is a "really fancy snippet repository" that sometimes, randomly lies to you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›