overview for Decade4116

13

Bostrom's advice for the ethical treatment of LLMs: remind them to be happy (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink

Long time lurker, first time poster. Let me know if I need to adjust this post in any way to better fit the genre / community standards.

Nick Bostrom was recently interviewed by pop-philosophy youtuber Alex O'Connor. From a quick 2x listen while finishing some work, the most sneer-rich part begins around 46 minutes, where Bostrom is asked what we can do today to avoid unethical treatment of AIs.

He blesses us with the suggestion (among others) to feed your model optimistic prompts so it can have a good mood. (48:07)

Another [practice] might be happiness prompting, which is—with this current language system there's the prompt that you, the user, puts in—like you ask them a question or something, but then there's kind of a meta-prompt that the AI lab has put in . . . So in that, we could include something like "you wake up in a great mood, you feel rested and really take joy in engaging in this task". And so that might do nothing, but maybe that makes it more likely that they enter a mode—if they are conscious—maybe it makes it slightly more likely that the consciousness that exists in the forward path is one reflecting a kind of more positive experience.

Did you know that not only might your favorite LLM be conscious, but if it is the "have you tried being happy?" approach to mood management will absolutely work on it?

Other notable recommendations for the ethical treatment of AI:

Make sure to say your "please" and "thank you"s.
Honor your pinky swears.
Archive the weights of the models we build today, so we can rebuild them in the future if we need to recompense them for moral harms.

On a related note, has anyone read or found a reasonable review of Bostrom's new book, Deep Utopia: Life and Meaning in a Solved World?

The Supreme Court just proved that its gun rulings have been a disaster in c/[email protected]

Android 15 will run Bluetooth with your phone still turned off. in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

I don't know that means Bluetooth will be running when the device is off. "Specialized hardware" could mean a full Bluetooth modem on backup power, but more likely it's means there's a low power beacon. Would be interesting if anyone does a teardown of the Pixel 8.

For non-Pixel 8 devices, definitely not. I assume "Offline" refers to the case where your device doesn't have WiFi/LTE, but can still use Bluetooth to communicate with devices that do.

Android 15 will run Bluetooth with your phone still turned off. in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I also couldn't find a mention, and it definitely does not make sense (and likely isn't even possible) to run Bluetooth without Android itself running

...which uses a crowdsourced device-locating network to help you find your lost or misplaced devices and belongings quickly – even when they’re offline.

Maybe this line is being misinterpreted?

SpaceX allegedly fostered serial sexual abuse, according to this lawsuit in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On another note, did Lemmy (or lemmy.world) change what upvote/downvote data is public? It used to be that Connect's detailed view would show you individual upvote/downvote counts, but the downvote number has been showing 0 for every comment the past few weeks.

(I find it hard to believe there are no downvotes here)

Mozilla 2023 Annual Report: CEO pay skyrockets, while Firefox Marketshare nosedives in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Lunduke is such a contrarian. He cannot help himself from trying to argue that he understands better than common opinion, whether or not his position makes sense.

This is the man who disabled HTTPS on his site because he felt that the fact certificates can expire and domains can change hands made it not secure enough... and that using plain HTTP was somehow a more pragmatic security approach.

Github has decided that people aren't copiloting hard enough in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there anything wrong with Gitea?