BeeOneTwoThree

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Every competitive game has a ranking system. I do not see any issue playing and trying to improve, just reduce your expectations.

A lot of 20 year olds are trash in a lot of competitive games

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I understand it like it is a service like foodora. So first they need to create the ingredients, package and sell them to the restaurants. The second packaging and delivery is home to you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I do the same my friend, and I can confirm it is not a popular opinion at work. How dare you pay for a service you are enjoying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do agree that it is possible to be motivated by other things than money, but in todays society you need income to survive.

If we had other systems to deligate money to everyone I agree that we might not need to do things for money.

I love services that are free, and driven by communities that are motivated by what they are doing. But these services also need some kind of income today. Wikipedia is dependent on donations, mosts blogs have sponsors, ads or is used to further a career.

I have no issues with this, I will glady donate to Wikipedia, and I understand why blogs might have ads or sponsors in them. But if you enjoy a service it is kinda wierd to not want to give anything back to the creator.

I understand google is fucked, but we cant just sit back and not understand why a free version of youtube will not exist. Maybe youtube should just die, but why are we complaining about a comany taking payment for a service? Fuck google, fuck facebook, but don't complain that they want payment for huge expensive services that basically could not survive without any income.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess they don't have to profit, but I believe they do have to cover their expenses (salary, hosting, etc). This is needed with capatalism or any other model (yes I know they have huge profits sadly)

I do agree that the market is failing, where we have way to little competition. Or that maybe a alternative to capatilism would solve the issue.

But in every thread here I feel like most people just expect to use everything on the internet for free, which is absurd to me. Why would anyone host a service like youtube if you didnt get any income from the users? The server costs alone must be huge.

Why would people write articles if they do not get any money from it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Most people I know have meat or fish to every dinner.

Yes meat is tasty, but so is a lot of vegiterian dishes``

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People can't think critically over why they prefer meat over vegetables. They just think they do it because hurr durr meat tastes better or you need protines.

If they actually think about the fact that they have been eating meat for every meal since they were a child they might understand that it is just a habit they have formed.

I strongly suggest to those people to try to have 1 dinner a week without meat or fish. It has nothing todo about taste and all about habits and what you are used to.

Try to challenge yourself a little bit and you might get a better perspective over these things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It won't decimate the planet, but it will make the planet a lot less habitable for humans.

So yes depending on where they live they will be just fine, but a lot of people will die. Because of this there will be huge migrations and struggels with having enough resources...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jeg er helt enig!

For de som lurer på hva fordelen av toppskåret pølsebrød er, så har jeg etter mye omtanke kommet på en eneste grunn: Ved at pølsebrødet er toppskåret kan det stå oppreist på tallerkenen.

Det er genialt, men jeg er så vant til sideskåret at jeg blir irritert hver gang jeg kommer over dette fenomenet.

view more: next ›