Alllo

@Perchance you mentioned improving the ai art a while ago and mention on the page of the plugin improving it.

I now have an opinion which can be summarized by looking at this image. This is SD3.5

I managed maybe 40 upvotes tops in that forum with Perchance images and even SDXL can't do things coherently enough to really convey a message. Anyway, so after much SDing, I, having used SD3.5 significantly, find it is top tier and competes at top tier while none of the other SDs can. Interestingly I also broke 100 upvotes via Bing. I find I basically use Perchance and SD3.5 now (they are different and SD3.5 is not actually 100% better. Variety among images actually seems less. Like if I take prompts made on beautiful people in to sd3.5, all images with words 'mythic superwitch' and 'dreamlike' become images of ugly glowy red midgets, no matter the variation of the other like 90 words of the prompt).

So, while I have literally no idea how achievable this is, my perspective is that Perchance is a fine unique niche now and that upgrading to anything before 3.5 is not 3.5 and thus a waste ~it would just be 'along the same lines as 3.5 but worse'. Also it, and even SDXL before it are different enough from Perchance that i think ai-plugin should not be 'upgraded' but a second plugin made for, hopefully, SD3.5 and users can use one or the other for quite some time. Just my opinion on the ai art upgrading I hear occasionally.

pretty sure i didnt do anything so my guess is something new u implemented

After trillIons of years of it working errorlessly, edits to a custom T2I tonight caused me to get this error even tho my audio plugin was written with an eventlistener for click identically to how the Perchance Audio Plugin suggested script does.

I'm not sure why the error and I think it doesn't matter. What matters is I solved it with this: so my code now is window.addEventListener("click", function(){if(navigator.userActivation.isActive && etc etc and it no longer bugs because it checks whether the user counts as active.

Whatever fringe scenario was causing mine to bug (a programmatic click perhaps?) would I'm sure also have happened with https://perchance.org/background-audio-plugin, and since I just solved mine with this nice little line, I am suggesting navigator.userActivation.isActive for https://perchance.org/background-audio-plugin too (to preemptively not have anyone encounter this bug).

It isnt an admin deleting them since it is happening on starlitsky too and I haven't set admins. Anything I type disappears.

Also here is me responding to glass, screenshotting, refreshing, screenshotting and you can see the comment is gone.

nothing i have typed today nor yesterday is there

@Perchance, looking at the TextToImage plugin page again today the wrongness of the line 'the same seed generates the exact same picture' is sort of jarring since nothing else on the page is false nor misleading (that i kno of).

for those of you who dont know, the same seed generates a variety of similar pictures.

If i bring up someones generator in an iframe, does that help them as much (views and whatever else) as if I navigate the user to the generator page in a separate window?

hi. nuublet here.

`let x = "PerchanceListA"

[x]`

how do i have it retrieve PerchanceListA instead of a list named x?

I bet it's something simple like some evaluateScript thing but i don't know because I'm a noob :)

explained to someone why:

stuff = blah blah blah
  thing = meow

doesn't work. But it actually could. 'stuff' COULD be an object that can both hold it's own value AND hold arrays of items. Tho probably so much would have to be changed to have it work seamlessly that it's undoable. Interesting potential improvement that came to light today tho.

• New type of generator: Music Mix
• https://perchance.org/allos-music-mix-1
• uses https://perchance.org/much-audio song list plugin

Currently in the Generators Page chat, everyone has a blue tag xcept F1EX. Was thinking what we can do and realized: hey, in comments, can we please have an option to choose our tag colors?

i think the suggestion itself is not nsfw so it shouldn't be tagged nsfw. Anyway, I have noticed trillions of times now that there is an everpresent issue among people trying to generate nsfw images that are not specifically Anthro nor Anime that the HD and Realistic model or models seem badly or not trained on NSFW content. It is a question I and probably everyone with an ai art generator has had asked of us. Also, tons of people generate NSFW images. I believe, as far as models perchance text-to-image could have, realistic nsfw is the one that currently is the biggest missing model that, if present, would appeal to most people.

Someone on the chat of generators page at 1:14am today asked: "How do I find roleplays here? I find the generator overwhelming but if I go to search it just takes me to google. I assumed creations would show me like a.i people have already made"

I remember a while ago Perchance saying Findability could be improved. I agree and had been thinking maybe have a community event of everyone suggest stuff for 'generator finding' and for a while dabbled in recording which generators passed thru the Generators page that I thought people really cared about and were following up on and making a personally curated list, which I know many others have occasionally thought similarly and tried.

But none of that is really a concrete followable step by step improvement. Tonight tho, with that comment, here is one: Make the Search feature a real feature.

Right now it DOES feel 'underwhelming' in that someone clicks Search at the top of the Generator's page, and then it is 'surprisingly disappointing' when it does not really search through generators, but opens up a google with a specific search term. So here is a concrete suggestion as to improving findability while also pulling up something that has fallen behind in quality compared to everything around it: Upgrade Search Function on Generators Page. Make the search a real thing :)