10_dollar_banana

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What about the time they fired their artists and then immediately wrote a blog post congratulating themselves for making AI art from a model trained on the ex-employees' art. Inspiring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Excellent, excellent. One thought, though. Maybe it should be boom, boom, and then kaboom. Sort of a hoo-ah grand finale!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I DUWUNNA DIIIIIIIIIE

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My experience is that the hate is for the ethnic group, not necessarily the religion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Missed out on Mianus, CT.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least it's photoshopped

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Pawppenheimer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'll be increasing my donation to the WFP, because I'm able and I think their work is needed. But $121 million by the end of the year? That's a drop in the bucket for a first-world nation budget. Maybe we could buy one or two fewer bombs this year.

2
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Permanently Deleted

 

The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Biden's administration a major victory in a long-running dispute over how to enforce the nation's immigration laws.

The case concerned the Biden administration's attempt to set guidelines for whom immigration authorities can target for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana sued to block the guidelines, arguing that they were preventing immigration authorities from doing their jobs.

The Supreme Court held by a vote of 8-1 that the states lacked standing to bring the case in the first place.

view more: next ›