17
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Non-paywalled link: https://archive.ph/9Hihf

In his latest NYT column, Ezra Klein identifies the neoreactionary philosophy at the core of Marc Andreessen's recent excrescence on so-called "techno-optimism". It wasn't exactly a difficult analysis, given the way Andreessen outright lists a gaggle of neoreactionaries as the inspiration for his screed.

But when Andreessen included "existential risk" and transhumanism on his list of enemy ideas, I'm sure the rationalists and EAs were feeling at least a little bit offended. Klein, as the founder of Vox media and Vox's EA-promoting "Future Perfect" vertical, was probably among those who felt targeted. He has certainly bought into the rationalist AI doomer bullshit, so you know where he stands.

So have at at, Marc and Ezra. Fight. And maybe take each other out.

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

surface probing of the RatioSphere indicates that ezra has already, by associating with NY times, become something something molech, thus limiting interaction between these these two [sic] Tribes by mechanism of -consults terminology cheat sheet- absurdity heuristic

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

surf https://www.huffpost.com/entry/americans-welfare-perceptions-survey_n_5a7880cde4b0d3df1d13f60b surf https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/16/politics/biden-welfare-queen-blake/index.html

quick question: who will be left to avenge ms nina simone?

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1277 readers
102 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS