@[email protected] ? As far I learnt in high school they are loosely related languages, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages
Japan
For all things related to Japan. We aim to be a hub for Japanese news and Japanese users
Rules
-
Keep all topic related to Japan
-
Language can be either in English or Japanese
-
If posting a news article, please provide a link as source
@[email protected] These days, it's considered its own language family - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japonic_languages
@[email protected] seems like a ongoing mystery
"...both (Koreanic and Japaonic) are still so different from the Core Altaic languages that we can even speak of an independent Japanese-Korean type of grammar. Given also that there is neither a strong proof of common Proto-Altaic lexical items nor solid regular sound correspondences but, rather, only lexical and structural borrowings between languages of the Altaic typology..."
I feel like what you're doing here is trying to answer a high-complexity question with a low complexity observation. A bit similar to "this winter is very cold, global warming is supposed to make things warmer. Why the contradiction?"
Whether certain linguists have some sort of bias, which they very well may have, or not, the way they look at languages definitely is a lot more complex and detailed than a general "the grammar and structure are similar" just like climate scientists...