this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

Interesting Global News

2899 readers
264 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sweden started building a final storage facility for spent nuclear fuel on Wednesday, only the second such site in the world, where highly radioactive waste will be stored for 100,000 years.

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250116073617/https://www.arctictoday.com/sweden-starts-building-100000-year-storage-site-for-spent-nuclear-fuel/

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.arctictoday.com%2Fsweden-starts-building-100000-year-storage-site-for-spent-nuclear-fuel%2F

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think that is awesome, but the thumbnail image is totally giving T-Virus vibes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Had to look it up myself.

The T-Virus from the Resident Evil series:

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Also The Hive, just being huge and underground:

(Picture of The Hive from Resident Evil)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

What SCP containment site is that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

New place of honor dropped

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

[...] will consist of 60 km of tunnels buried 500 metres down in 1.9 billion year old bedrock.

Are 500 meters deep enough?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

500m is the industry standard depth for deep geological repositories for nuclear waste

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's way more than is needed to block any radiation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about archeologists of a distant future?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Start turning the words to don't change colour kitty

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think that's still being debated or decided or refined. Warnings or signage need to be interpreted correctly in 80,000 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Google hostile architecture for nuclear waste sites.

It's better than a skull and crossbones in my opinion

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And yet I keep hearing from nuclear fans that there's nothing to worry about and that it's safe. And how is this cheaper than renewable. That place has to be maintained and secured for 100,000 years.

If we put that onto our timeline, we were just getting out of Africa and using stone tools.

That's not the sort of gift we should be leaving our descendents. Okay we have to deal with what we have, but we shouldn't be making any more of the stuff. Because there will be an accident somewhen down the line.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People wanting to save the environment for our children, by leaving nuclear waste with a half life time of 24.000 to billions of years for them to take care of, are a certain kind of stupid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That's the bit I don't understand either.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The whole point of doing it this way is that it doesn't need to be maintained. Once it's full you just fill the tunnels up (probably with dirt and/or rock) and close them off and you're good, it'll sit there for those 100,000 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've heard those lines way too often. You cannot build in a way that guarantees safety for every scenario. Your concrete fails, water erodes into the caverns, earthquakes, volcanos, or simply someone digging in that spot. How the hell do you believe we can build something that pasts for longer than mankind has documented it self in any way? The Nazis failed to build something that would last a thousand years, that is a fraction of the time you claim will be absolutely safe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

It's a lot harder to "build" an empire to last 1000 years while simultaneously going to war with everyone though.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

No security or monitoring? No warnings about digging or mining?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

And yet it's still better than destroying the global environment.