this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
1009 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

3325 readers
1779 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

Man Ubisoft could be so great but they just land so meh. Watchdogs, tom Clancy wildlands, the division, farcry. They all have potential but just don't have that last 15%

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Embracer killed Deus Ex.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago

Eat shit and die motherfucker

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Ubisoft Executives need to get comfortable not eating food anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago

You love to see it

[–] [email protected] 94 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

"Company fails to generate infinite revenue even after implementing every abusive tactic known".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Imagine, about five years ago, they peaked at $82.

It was also during that time when they talked about getting into Crypto, NFTs, and all sorts of other get rich quick schemes.

Now look at them.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

More like, company keeps pushing for short-term profits, runs out of goodwill built up in the past.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ubisoft had many long standing issues, but disowning The Crew users was the worst possible move they could have made in their already dire situation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

I played and enjoyed both of them, shutting down the first one instead of giving it offline functionality really pissed me off and was the final straw for me with Ubi. It had a fully offline playable story, NPC vehicles to race etc. and the game would've been preserved forever.

Instead we got the crew 2, always online AAA signature garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

It feels tragic. On the one hand, they made some of my most favourite games especially the Splinter Cell series, and it would be sad to see a once great developer to go. But then on the other, the greedy bastards deserve to go under for ruining some of my most favourite games including the Splinter Cell series.

But seriously though, if Ubisoft do go under, I hope that their IP would go into safe hands, like how Baldur's Gate franchise has been handed over from Bioware to the competent team of Larian (and I do hope Larian does not enshittify unlike the fate of other companies, such as Ubisoft and EA).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I do hope Larian does not enshittify

They will, as the studio is close to be owned by Tencent now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

If it's any consolation, probably all the game devs that worked on your favourite titles have left Ubisoft long ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Larian isn't making another Baldur's Gate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It’s funny how many times they’ve clearly stated it too lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

The best thing about it is that they're not making another BG just because they don't want to. I think it is safe to say say that they won't enshitify as long as Swen Vincke is at the helm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

They were decent to the Anno series, but honestly that's probably just because they didn't see the value in messing with the formula that Anno solidified around the time of the acquisition and it reliably boosts their numbers with strategy gamers who otherwise might not be customers of Ubisoft's at all

[–] [email protected] 31 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Part of me is sad because some of my favorite games might get shitcanned as a result, but it’s a loss I’m willing to accept if it kills such a parasitic company.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

I'll be sad if For Honor stops being supported

[–] [email protected] 28 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Came here to say this.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Literally all they had to do was make good games

[–] [email protected] 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure what you mean. They needed more NFTs and AI from what I can tell! /s

Honestly though whenever I hear big companies like this fail, it keeps making me go back to the Steve Jobs interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlBjNmXvqIM

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How have I never seen that interview!? Thanks, great stuff...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

It's funny it happened to Apple too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Ubisoft executives need to become comfortable with "not being employed."

[–] [email protected] 51 points 15 hours ago

Unfortunately, that's not how this works.

This is late stage capitalism, execs are judged on how much money they managed to squeeze out before the company died. They'll be hired immediately specifically to do it again somewhere else.

The company dying in incidental.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

they MBA'd themselves into extinction

edit; everyone with an mba is only qualified to be a farm laborer

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Every single MBA holder I have met has been a completely shit human being. Without exception.

They’re qualified to be pig feed.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Farm labor is complicated and specialized.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago

And fucking physically hard

[–] [email protected] 69 points 17 hours ago

Hey now, I know a bunch of farm laborers and started out as one myself.

They are nowhere near qualified for farm labor. That requires being able to work, not just regurgitate platitudes from the most recent bullshit management fad.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Management will destroy this world.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 16 hours ago

There’s a world where management is treated as an important but not godly position. Where they are schedulers and arbitrators of conflict, and where they aren’t free from consequences because they’re already at the top. And holy hell it’s also not the place where the position is used to promote someone out of where they’re useful simply because paying a labourer more than a manager is seen as unthinkable. It ain’t this one, but I like to think about it sometimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ubisoft always reminds me of an old pun my Latin teacher taught us: Semper ubi sub ubi. Always where under where.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 259 points 21 hours ago (18 children)

You're right Ubisoft, I am pretty comfortable not owning your games 🥰

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 19 hours ago

I guess shareholders got used to not owning their stock?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

FFS just get Olden Era released and then go die in a corner somewhere, Ubisoft.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 15 hours ago

They need to get comfortable with losing their company.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's because they're not AAA anymore. They went AAAA so I guess they've had a financial rating overflow and now they've gone negative.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Get rid of uplay. I might buy ubisoft games if they weren't tied to that horrible service

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›