I don't know the details of the other 37 inmates. But knowing our justice system, I think this is a good thing?
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2250 readers
36 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It means Trump can't just execute a bunch of people, so that's a moral win.
Wouldn't be surprised if statically at least one of these people were innocent, so hopefully, this allows time for any such innocence to be discovered.
I don’t find this to be some moral win. He still clearly believes he gets to decide who dies.
no offense but: i can't believe that a statist society, which gives the state a monopoly on violence, gets to decide who lives or dies
Previously, Biden put a moratorium on federal executions. This just further extends that until new death row inmates are sentenced.
So I don't think he believed he gets to decide who dies. He's never supported the death penalty afaik.
So I don’t think he believed he gets to decide who dies. He’s never supported the death penalty afaik.
He chose to exclude the three mentioned though. So clearly he's compromising for crimes he or his base see as unforgivably evil.
Have you considered that the 3 he didn't commute were chosen not because they deserve death, but are too dangerous to be set free?
The Boston Marathon bomber and 2 people who attacked religious ceremonies. These are people who are more likely to go on and try again. And each of their crimes resulted in multiple deaths the first time.
Unless you think they're particularly likely to escape, I don't see the difference between death and life without parole as regards "too dangerous to set free". The unabomber died in prison serving out that very sentence.
So, someone else chose to not do the same for those last three or he didn’t have the power?