this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1570 readers
289 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On its face, the EU DMA is meant to stop monopolies from abusing their market position, but Meta appears to be abusing this legislation in an attempt to gather unprecedented access to iPhone user data.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Didn't expect the law to cut both ways...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is (one of the reasons) why Apple have been so defensive about their ecosystem.

They have slowly been building their security to protect their customers from bad actors, as the bad actors have been slowing finding ways to exploit people.

In early versions of iOS, there was little to no security, all apps had unfettered access, Apple started restricting access to more and more of the users data, and the arms race began.

Now the bad actors have tricked legislators into violating user security in favour of their scams and data mining reselling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There is a big misconception here.

Apple only limits 3rd party tracking and access. 1st party tracking by Apple, a known bad actor, is not affected by all the security measures they implement.

Clearest example of that being, that Apple backups everything to iCloud of which they keep E2EE disabled by default. Hence, all the content being available in plan text to Apple and anyone else who can compromise your Apple account. Fun fact: that's where majority of celebrity nude leaks come from by the way.

And since the whole ecosystem is closed by design, you have no option to circumvent that unlike with open ecosystems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Glad I switched from iOS to Graphene OS and no Google all Open Source.