this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
188 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1481 readers
293 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That website only works in private mode on Firefox for me, and even then some pages display different things than it is saying it will. It feels like an easter egg almost, does someone have more info about this group?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

u wot? works fine in Firefox here. Try this archive or this archive.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I think our comments just crossed each other, read my follow up. I think it was an issue with the site at that specific moment (500 error) instead of the site being quirky

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

same here, works fine in Fx (133, aarch64)

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Privacy Browser with JS off (by default) can read the article and navigate, only minor eye-sore are the buttons at the top of the site which are on a transparent background and stay on top of the text as I scroll down

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

hmm maybe it was just a temporary issue. I was getting a 500 error while still seeing part of the site, and the about page had some pseudocode on it that I thought was intentional, but maybe it was just being a bit buggy because now it seems fine.

The blog post itself is an interesting read bytheway, forgot to mention that in my curiosity for interesting web pages

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (67 children)

After all, there's almost nothing that ChatGPT is actually useful for.

It's takes like this that just discredit the rest of the text.

You can dislike LLM AI for its environmental impact or questionable interpretation of fair use when it comes to intellectual property. But pretending it's actually useless just makes someone seem like they aren't dissimilar to a Drama YouTuber jumping in on whatever the latest on-trend thing to hate is.

load more comments (67 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

What is up wit h the design of this website. There's huge amounts of dead space.

The content though... it just reads like somebody who's pretty angry. I do like the odd rant here and there, but this one misses the mark. "I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again" was much more to my liking (despite the damn 3 column design).

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 19 hours ago

What is up wit h the design of this website. There's huge amounts of dead space.

The content though... it just reads like somebody who's pretty angry. I do like the odd rant here and there, but this one misses the mark. "I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again" was much more to my liking (despite the damn 3 column design).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›