this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32400 readers
215 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Librewolf i got 16.48 bits of information, on TOR browser 10.32 bits, but on Tails I managed to get only 9.3 bits.

https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/

(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

I appreciate the site, but what score is considered good or bad? A cool stat would be some kind of score compared to everyone else.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago

Interesting, this is a cool test! Unsurprisingly, my setup is rather unique.

One thing that stood out to me is that it failed to detect my adblocker. Also, my screen size alone is unique: 1 in 181697 of this 181697 browsers tested.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Best methods to lower the score on android? I tested multiple browsers on EFF. 17 bits regardless of browser.

[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@walledgarden.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 91389.5 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 16.48 bits of identifying information

Doesn't look good. How do you make it so that your browser doesn't have a fingerprint at all?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

17.47 on mobile Vivaldi.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How does tails get the bits so low?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I misread the title as "Cover your taxes" and got really excited to earn about tax avoidance tips. Legal ones obviously.

[–] LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

After disabling extension "I still don't care about cookies" on Librewolf, I went from 17.48 bits unique fingerprint to 16.48 nearly unique one.

What would be considered a high score on this? Is 16 too high?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?

[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

if it ran the test again, I'd say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn't mean anything

yeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Idk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though

[–] ripley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It seems like the characteristics of my Android tablet doom me here - I was unique even using Chrome.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›