this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

SpacePics

1 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to sharing high quality images of space and the cosmos

Rules:

  1. Include some context in the title (such as the name of the astronomical object or location where it was photographed)

  2. Only images, pictures, collages, albums, and gifs are allowed. Please link images from high quality sources (Imgur, NASA, ESA, Flickr, 500px , etc.) Videos, interactive images/websites, memes, and articles are not allowed

  3. Only submit images related to space. This may include pictures of space, artwork of space, photoshopped images of space, simulations, artist's depictions, satellite images of Earth, or other related images

  4. Be civil to one another

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's so blue.

Like, I know it's not news. And I know in "true color" it's closer to grey. But Jupiter was not blue when I was a kid. It's just so much more colorful. So much more going on. so much more dynamic and complicated.

I cannot comprehend how anyone could ever think sending probes out to take pictures is a waste of money, even ignoring all the real and applicable science that can come from it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People are like why do X when Y is still a problem?

I get that but the world is big why not do both?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If we want to solve global warming and survive as a society, extraplanetary research is crucial. When we look outward, we learn about things that apply inward. NASA has something like a 17-1 return on investments. Every dollar we put into NASA returns so much more in tech and knowledge we can apply to help people here. It's always a good investment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Comedians and similar people who make content out of stuff they see in the news seem to be especially prone to this kind of thinking. They see an article about a phyics discovery or a math theorem or a sociology experiment and say something about science should focus on solving world hunger or curing cancer instead.

Seemingly ignorant of the facts that
a) Science isn't a monolith, and a sociologist or mathematician isn't a virologist or oncologist or whatever else would be needed for the problem they're ranting about.
b) Even if someone happened to be in the correct field for the problem the idiot is ranting about, they often couldn't help with the problem anyway because they're lacking the required experience and knowledge and just throwing people at the problem doesn't help if those people are grad students or barely postgrads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's beautiful