this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1198 points (96.7% liked)

Political Memes

5434 readers
3188 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The Kentucky fried chicken chef guy is absolutely SLAYING those short shorts and boots 🔥🤩

Edit: apparently I already made this joke and forgot about it lmao

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Blame Connecticut. It’s their fault. It would up benefiting the South, but it was Delaware and CT mad about larger states having more a say.

The South actually wanted proportional representation. They were growing faster and had more land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Compromise

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

It would be somewhat OK if the House was much more powerful relative to the Senate, similar to how the (unelected) Canadian Senate rarely if ever opposes the will of the House.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

yeah...

It's the senate.

You forgot to look at the house lmao.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's a government by rich owners for rich owners and it's working as designed

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

And none of you poors can do anything about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't even care so much about the Bicameral Compromise; but I do care that the electoral votes apply toward electing the President.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

The reapportionment act of 1929 is screwing us over in the electoral college. The House should have a LOT more representatives, which would make the it more fair.

But more representatives would make it more difficult for big businesses to bribe them, and nobody is going to vote to dilute their personal power, so changing that is a nonstarter.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

We pay more in taxes than the welfare states, have less representation... Seems like there was something in US History about taxation without representation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Secede. That'll teach 'em.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago

Dare I say... defederate? *smugface*

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Honestly of all the states, California probably has the best chance at seceding successfully.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if California's GDP has surpassed that of the UK, which would make it the fifth largest economy in the world if it were to secede.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

A quick Google search says you are correct

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Should have stuck with the monarchy they had.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Brave of the Bri'ish to remind America they exist as we're on the cusp of our own outright Empire phase.

It's not poor countries that speak a different language that empires like to annex first.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

We have the technology to implement some direct democracy and get away from all this "represntitive democracy" that doesnt work so well. Let people vote on the actual issues and we'll get progressive policies pretty quickly, we wont get into wars, we'll spend much less on defense, and the corporatists wont be able to buy influence as easily.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

i honestly don't believe that any of this would be true. Unless you went the libertarian route and pretend that the people know better than the government at all levels. Maybe i'm just cynical. But there's a federal government for a reason so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

so you dont beleive in democracy, sounds like.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But look at the US popular vote. Even with different representation of the populace, this election would still have been fucked. We do need massive reform of the US voting structure, but this is not the biggest thing. Getting rid of first past the post in favor of at least ranked choice would make a much bigger difference.

That would open the door for a true left wing party to actually have a voice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Ranked voting is a very good thing all countries should implement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But then the poor would run the country instead of a handful of unimaginably rich individuals! What kind of democracy would THAT be?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

We don't know but it was guaranteed to be different.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

In Germany we have two votes, one for a local representative and one for a party. In itself it's a pretty decent system

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 226 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Don't worry the House balances it*

*Until they froze the House because they couldn't fit anymore chairs...

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›