this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
548 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
82
Colorado’s oil and gas industry says it’s reducing emissions at drilling sites by 95%. Environmentalists aren’t so sure. (www.denverpost.com)
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

I, for one, super trust the self reporting of the oil and gas industry.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Don't worry about the lack of a 95% reduction, the incoming federal admin will do its utmost to deregulate anyway. Real GOOD people, the best 👍👍👍

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

It may not be this particular case, but I remember looking into something similar before where an oil and gas company claimed a similar reduction in emissions at one of their plants, but the fine print made clear that the number came from a device installed on only one of several exhaust towers that was only able to operate for short periods of time, and was removed shortly after getting the publicity because it was considered too expensive to maintain.