this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9803 readers
59 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Of course, the real story here is how the elderly (and everyone else) are fucked over by car dependency and its associated suburban sprawl, shit public transport, and unwalkable neighbourhoods.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Being disabled isn't a matter of if but when for everyone. Expecting everyone to be able to drive literally tons of metal at high speeds around for ever is losing bet. Heck people with no current disability can't do it all the time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

To be fair, if you live in a place completely dependent on cars, what else can you do?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In the 79 years before turning 97, she could have not voted for policymakers who push car dependency and urban sprawl.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This will be fun when future generations blame literally all of us for climate change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

@explodicle @rcbrk
Assuming that there will be future generations…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Well, sucks to be her

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Boomkop3 @rcbrk Sounds like a pretty good point in the argument that car dependence is not freedom.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

@Boomkop3 @rcbrk (Which points out to me that we are plausibly all agreeing in different words)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The same thing all the other people who can't drive do: employ services or move to a place you can live in.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What a uselessly privileged comment. You can't possibly be making it in good faith, but on the off chance you really are that removed from reality:

Suggesting that a 97 year old person should "just move, bro" is ridiculous. It's a ridiculous suggestion for most people, regardless of age; most people are way too poor to hire a ride-share every day, or pick up and move their whole life at a whim.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I don't think it is ridiculous that an older person should move to have their needs met. That is pretty much the entire point of retirement homes and communities, they are more centered around the needs of seniors. You also hear people talk about "this will be ny retirement home" which is often a much smaller place than they would have had before.

I won't deny there are many other costs related to moving and the whole retirement home business has been getting exploitative but historically moving was actually a really good solution to her issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It's also not even a possibility. Properly walkable (for all abilities) neighbourhoods hardly exist in Australia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Free taxi for elders provided by a city council.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Just fucking give us public transport that is actually useful please