Where the fuck was this with the railway workers?
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10180 readers
81 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm not an American, but I'm assuming you're referring to this, right? It seems the administration kept fighting to get railroad workers sick days after that, so that half a year later, the railroad workers got their sick days:
This is a big deal, said Railroad Department Director Al Russo, because the paid-sick-days issue, which nearly caused a nationwide shutdown of freight rail just before Christmas, had consistently been rejected by the carriers. It was not part of last December’s congressionally implemented update of the national collective bargaining agreement between the freight lines and the IBEW and 11 other railroad-related unions.
“We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers.
Didn't know he did that. That's not the preferred action, but better than I expected.
Exactly my reaction :)
This is an interesting point. Optimisticly the administration may have learned from that experience it would be more politically advantagous to support unions rather than oppose them. More cynically and probably more realistically in my opinion, making a stand here is doing a great job whitewashing the administration's track record by going from the next in a long line of union busters to unprecedented PR moves like this along with some real policy strengthening unions. Either way I'm thankful for the development.
No it's just that the rail shutdown would have a far to big impact on US economy. Bidens administration did manage to get them their sick days in the end but they deserved so much more than that. It's rough when you're a truly essential worker.
Making a stand in favor of Unions at that time could have expedited negotiations without disrupting the economy with a prolonged shutdown, but the status quo for the last few decades has been to to force workers to work in favor of shareholders. They figured it wouldn't be as big of a deal since it hasn't been until recently, and they learned their political calculus was off.
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
It marked the first time a sitting president has joined a picket line, and on a dreary afternoon Biden stood on a wooden platform and spoke through a bullhorn with an American flag on it to a group of United Auto Workers members clad in red shirts.
Biden is also walking a delicate line as auto manufacturers assert that the strike and any contract concessions could impact production of electric vehicles, which are an important plank of the president’s clean energy policies.
In a sign of the heightened political importance of the UAW strike, and a potential preview of the 2024 presidential race, former president Donald Trump is planning to make his own visit to the area on Wednesday in a similar attempt to tap into the angst among industrial workers in the heartland.
One factor complicating Biden’s trip to Michigan is that his climate policy is in part dependent on auto manufacturers building more electric vehicles — a bigger challenge if workers are striking.
In a statement ahead of Biden’s trip, Trump focused on the president’s push for more electric vehicles, saying it would “annihilate the U.S. auto industry and cost countless thousands of autoworkers their jobs.”
Although the Trump campaign initially booked his prime-time appearance in Michigan to counterprogram against the second Republican primary debate Wednesday night — one that he is not joining — the former president’s aides were equally enthusiastic to see the speech shaping up to be an opening salvo in the general election rematch with Biden.
Saved 83% of original text.
Trump focused on the president’s push for more electric vehicles, saying it would “annihilate the U.S. auto industry and cost countless thousands of autoworkers their jobs.”
What leap of logic led to this statement? How does building EVs instead of gas-powered vehicles have any impact on their jobs in any way except positive? I understand how a strike can impact jobs, but not how switching to EVs can.
Trump... logic... these cannot coexist.
I choose logic
Well you see, no Real American™ would ever build something as woke as EVs
Trump
There's the problem though, zero science and/or logic was involved. It was actively rejected. Something something freeze peach....
I'm afraid for humanity's future.