this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
168 points (98.3% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

5610 readers
75 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's a matter of time before it happens to all of them. Helicopters require a ton of periodic maintenance, adjustments and upkeep. The Taliban don't have the culture, knowledge or access to parts to keep those air worthy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Parts inside of the transmission alone, which have manufacturing tolerances in the thousandths and up, are only good for a couple thousand hours of run time at most.

Some parts for these machines are made, at least in the US, on machines that could be one of less than 3 in existence. They're that specialized of parts, costing upwards of $750k+ per part. I'm sure they'll be able to source knock offs from other countries (China I'm sure has the means and probably blueprints), but they won't be within the tolerances, and idk how long the Taliban can shell out almost a million dollars per part for each helicopter.

Source: have family in the industry of machining helicopter parts for the government.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

china russia and others are able to manufacture and maintain military helicopters.

just dont see why they would ever do business with the taliban?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Flying one also requires a ton of training, which this "pilot" obviously didn't have.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The taliban took over a lot of American equipment when the pull out happened.

When the Military abandons equipment, they often sabotage it in some way so that it’s not useful to the enemy force.

Likely this helicopter had its tail rotor fucked with. It would have started and taken off okay in calm weather, but the moment the pilot attempted any kind of rotation, or got hit by a strong gust of wind, he was doomed.

This may have been the best pilot in the world, but once you’re in an out of control helicopter, there’s very little even the best pilot can do. It’s like if the stabilizer fell off a plane, there’s just not much you can do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the tail rotor was fucked with they wouldn't have gotten that far off the ground. They would have started to spin as soon as their weight started to come off the ground, you have to be actively on the pedals at all times, not just when turning.

This was pilot error all the way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a little more training and he could have found the ejection seat in time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I know this is a joke, but helicopters don't have ejection seats. If they did, they would just eject the pilot into the rotors and turn them into confetti.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They exist…just uncommon.

The Kamov Ka-50, which entered limited service with Russian forces in 1995, was the first production helicopter with an ejection seat. The system is similar to that of a conventional fixed-wing aircraft; however the main rotors are equipped with explosive bolts to jettison the blades moments before the seat is fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

True, they were probably better off selling these to China or Iran. Liquid assets and some degree of goodwill from regional powers will go a lot farther than whatever this was.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago

Not only was the piloting bad, so was the camera work. Holy fuck, keep the thing in the centre of the shot.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I'll bet I could fly that thing! How hard could it be?"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Narrator: it was very hard

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Trying to fly is somehow not a blaphemy but pictures of people are.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Allah wasn't very Akbar that day...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I know nothing about helicopters, but can't you autorotate down and increase your chances of not dying in a situation like this? I thought that's what they were doing before they pitched forward and immediately died.

OK helicopter nerds, destroy me.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

This idiot fucked up a perfectly operational helicopter in clear conditions at a safe altitude. There is exactly zero chance he could have safely managed an autorotation landing. And he wouldn't need to anyway, autorotation helps if the engine fails, but it was clearly still under power.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also know nothing about helicopters but I bet the answer is "yes... If you know how" with a follow up of "and they did not"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yup, to be fair it is entirely possible the damaged part made maintaining the proper descent impossible.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

To be fair it actually was Auto rotating down until the nose pitch down and it lost all the lift that it was generating and it wasn't until then that it then pitched straight down and slammed right into the ground face first

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah that's why I thought that was what they were doing, and then, instead, they abruptly decided to die.

I'm beginning to suspect they didn't know that they were doing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Cut him some slack, it was his first (and last) flight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The US sabotaged any equipment left behind. My guess is that they fixed that Black Hawk using parts off of multiple and some controls failed during their test.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably not. We only destroyed the classified stuff, there's no reason to make them unsafe and endanger people when you can buy them used for a couple hundred thousand anyway.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

My cousin was civilian DOD in charge of Bagram during the exit. Orders were to decommission anything useful and it was like Christmas for the Marines. Break everything was the rule. Everything.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Neat. It was widely publicized that that did not happen, they got the secret shit broken and then moved to making them junkpiles. Some got hammered to bits and others just got broke windshields and such.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

So like office space but military. That sounds super fun.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A new UH-60L is around $10-$20 million depending on avionics and weapons, and I am under the impression that even an old 1990s A-variant would still cost upwards of $2 million.

One example: https://www.hangar67.com/aircraft-for-sale/turbine-helicopters/sikorsky/uh60a-black-hawk

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A combat used, desert abandoned Blackhawk without necessary maintainance records can't be sold in any country that cares about that which is pretty much everyone but poor middle eastern countries and Russia. That makes it a couple hundred thousand (essentially the scrap value) and we've been dumping these things across the planet for the last 30 years so there's no shortage of crappy barely flight worthy ones popping about.

My guess is they bought the DCS Huey to learn how to fly out but refused to buy the collective. Keyboard and mouse to collective is very disorienting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Haha, good point. I stand corrected. :)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

2 Down 2 Furious

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Haha, they died terrified.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe God is punishing them for being terrible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Free Blackhawks for the Taliban.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How did the Taliban get their hands on helicopters? I thought the US limited what armaments they gave the Afghan military to prevent them from falling into the wrong hands

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There was a lot of leftover equipment due to the unexpected speed of the takeover. At the time there were discussions about destroying any remaining equipment but I believe they ended up figuring that things will naturally degrade and it isn't like they have anyone trained in using/repairing American equipment. No classified info unlike Trump's bathroom.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

A lot of maintenance is required for the equipment left behind. Sure, it looks good on their recruitment posters temporarily, but then 4 years later you get videos like this. Silly Taliban probably should have left some of those women studying engineering alone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I think they didnt manage to evacuate all the materials from bases when they pulled out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

We gave the ANA helicopters.

load more comments
view more: next ›