this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1427 readers
116 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (19 children)

oh great, commercial eugenics

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

We knew it was bound to happen sometime with capitalism

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's not how IQ works you idiots.

Wait. Who's the idiots? The ones selling the service, the ones falling for the service, or the embryos that they decide to have low IQ?

I'd say the first two, and if the parents are responsible for the education of the kid, all three.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Re one, what is worse? People selling anti wifi amulets that they know don't work? Or people who sell them while not understanding (nor believing) that they dont work? (More likely it doesnt matter as it remains a scam. Ow god, im getting close to doing actual ethical thinking here).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the Wi-Fi blocking Faraday cages to "protect" modems a few years ago. Those at least did exactly what was promised lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Finally a tool to make my lan wifi very local.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Given these three steps, what's the logical fourth one?"
"..."
"God this embryo is an idiot."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Doesn’t even know the basic strats for these pattern questions, SMH, Do You Even IQ Test? (trying to start DYEIQT)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good luck having an embryo pass an iq test. Most of them can't even read.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Legitimately though, it's a nonsensical metric to screen on.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

The thing with IVF is that it's already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

Like, read some of the parameters they'd screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I'm sorry? You're looking for a better-educated sperm?

And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. "I want my cum to be a pilot!" The fuck.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Lamarckian eugenics!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn't understand how the hell the "pro-life" crowd would cheer for IVF since it entails destroying plenty of embryos. Now I understand: it's the opportunity for some good old fashioned eugenics.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They’re not cheering. Evangelical anti-abortion activists have long targeted IVF and it’s been practically banned in at least one US state.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reminds me of how marriage advice has its roots in white supremacy. (CW: a lot. self harm, SA, abuse)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

IQ is so incredibly complicated, and we really don't know how it works, and what genes allow for the possibility of high IQ. So what are they even screening for? If they're just looking at broad trends in population IQ compared to genetics, then what they're actually seeing are environmental factors, which play an immense role in whether or not potential is ever reached.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

But on the plus side, the people capable of paying for this bullshit are going to have significantly higher chance of proper nutrition for their kids, access to good education, and ability to avoid environmental toxins, so they just have to compare their "handpicked sperm" to the population as a whole and they'll show great results.

Yeah this is an obvious scam lol.

(It's not about IQ specifically, but to anyone interested in how many different environment factors play a role in human behavior/outcomes, Behave by Robert Sapolsky is an excellent overview of research in a broad variety of fields. It's definitely not a light read, but it doesn't assume too much prior knowledge, and is one of my favorite books on what makes us tick.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would definitely hate to be burdened with an IQ. Such a terrible thing to be born with

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Only if burdened with emotional intermittence, as well.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Gross, but I'm not shocked. IVF and prenatal genetics screening is big business, it was really only a matter of time until someone tried pulling this. As much as it shouldn't be the case, the 'line must go up' edict holds in the medical business too. I know some large lab services companies that are likely watching groups like this with great interest (but letting them take the risks first, which is smart because this is a con).

My hope is that someone squashes this and we keep screening limited to risks for severe developmental disorders (which, even still, is at least a little ethically problematic) and conditions that lower the probability of the pregnancy coming to term. But we'll see - there's gold in dem der embryos.

Edit: Read the original investigative article. Modern Nazis are reportedly involved. Again, gross, but not shocked. https://investigations.hopenothate.org.uk/superbaby-factory/

Would love to see further independent verification from a non-activism-focused source (to be clear, I am not saying the investigators are being irresponsible in their reporting), but the way newsroom budgets have been slashed these days, it's really only outlets like this doing actual, old school investigative work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

GATTICA! GATTICA! GATTICA!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GATTACATS would be the most cursed musical possible and every day I give thanks that we live in a world where it doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Won't one crucial difference be that Gattaca's genetic selection actually worked? This will be a techbro "move fast and break things" con job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Scott Alexander pokes his head up out of the astroturf and whispers, "It's showtime."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I only have about fifty embryos, can I pay $50k to have them scanned now and have another 50 embryo scans left on my account or do I have to have all of them on hand immediately?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

training your sperm to pass raven's progressive matrices

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

At least corvids are smart. Better that than some birdbrain's progressive matrices.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I actually read a Red Dwarf fanfic about this once where Rimmer's parents had paid for embryo selection to make sure all their kids had high IQs and good genes because they wanted to make sure they all got into the Space Corps

load more comments
view more: next ›