Privacy

1147 readers

9 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Desktop version 2024.10.0 is no longer free software · Issue #11611 · bitwarden/clients (github.com)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm unfamiliar with bitwarden's licence and skimmed through the issue and my understanding is:

To use bitwarden API you must use SDK
To use SDK you are obligated to be the official application, otherwise you violate the licence
The official application is GPL but since SDK is somehow 'separate program' it is considered OK to couple with a more restrictive license

However, our goal is to make sure that the SDK is used in a way that maintains GPL compatibility.

This is something I completely fail to understand other that mental gymnastics to bend the truth enough to not look like they are not quite right

Edit: is my understanding correct? It looks like this is not the first project that becomes 'source available' after being FOSS in the past, as of lately

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Scummy behavior from Bitwarden, especially the locking of the issue. It's clear they have no intention of preserving their open source efforts now that they've gotten big enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ight, imma go back to KeePass

EDIT: Jesus FUCKING Christ! £59.99 for Strongbox Pro‽ I've got to get an Android at some point...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Glad I don't need to rely on this project. Get fucked, Bitwarden.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I recently set up Vaultwarden as a backup, and I'm glad I did. Does anybody know an alternative?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I use KeePass and manually sync my password database file through cloud storage. I specifically prefer it over anything giving me web and online interfaces. I load from local file or on my phone from cloud storage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why did you go with KeePass over KeePassXC?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I don't remember whether I serious considered that. I don't see it in the Play store. I likely preferred original source.

Looking at the screenshots, it looks like a waste of space. A no go for me, given the alternative.

https://keepassxc.org/assets/img/screenshots/database_view.png

Compare that to the condensed, concise Keepass interface:

https://keepass.info/screenshots/keepass_2x/main_big.png

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Well well well....

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Being able to build the app as you are trying to do here is an issue we plan to resolve and is merely a bug.