this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
30 points (94.1% liked)

Hardware

658 readers
135 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
30
Intel admits Core Ultra 9 285K will be slower than i9-14900K in gaming (videocardz.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

By 3 frames per second at over 260 fps for a savings of 80 watts.

Spend your watts on a better graphics card babe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be honest, I don't think that's too bad of a trade-off, but I can see how this would be controversial in the context of desktop computing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it's bizarre how IHVs will absolutely crank power for such marnigal gains in average fps :(

I'm happy ARL is taking this approach.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They admitted this when they announced the ultra core series.

I'm not exactly sure how the ultra core series are better, but the evaluation team at my company determined that the ultra 7 265H outperformed the last i9 in an equivalent laptop.

I'm not impressed with it so far as the damn thing won't work with the dock >.<

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

So this is what marketing can spit out in their best possible light. That means it can only go downhill from here. Not very promising.