this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

vegan

2688 readers
118 users here now

Please also check out vegantheoryclub.org for a great set of well-run communities for vegan news, cooking, gardening, and art. It is not federated with LW, but it is a nice, cozy, all-in-one space for vegans.


We ask that the you have an understanding on what veganism is before engaging in this community.

If you think you have been banned erroneously, please get in contact with one of the other mods for appeals.

Moderator reports may not federate properly and may delay moderator action. Please DM an active mod if an abusive comment remains after reporting it.


Welcome

Welcome to c/[email protected]. Broadly, this community is a place to discuss veganism. Discussion on intersectional topics related to the animal rights movement are also encouraged.

What is Veganism?

'Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals ...'

— abridged definition from The Vegan Society

Rules

The rules are subject to change, especially upon community feedback.

  1. Discrimination is not tolerated. This includes speciesism.
  2. Topics not relating to veganism are subject to removal.
  3. Posts are to be as accessible as practicable:
    • embedded images of text require alt-text
    • posts with an image of text should have a transcription in the body or alt-text
    • paywalled articles must have an accessible non-paywalled link;
    • use the original source whenever possible for a news article.
  4. Content warnings are required for triggering content.
  5. Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future.
    • before jumping into the community, we encourage you to read examples of common fallacies here.
    • if you're asking questions about veganism, be mindful that the person on the other end is trying to be helpful by answering you and treat them with at least as much respect as they give you.
  6. Posts and comments whose contents – text, images, etc. – are largely created by a generative AI model are subject to removal. We want you to be a part of the vegan community, not a multi-head attention layer running on a server farm.
  7. No brigading, either off-site or on-site. An incitement to brigade includes two elements: a call to disruptive action and a specific direction outside of this community in which to take that action. Exceptions include:
    • Calls to boycott.
    • Calls to in-person protest of a government, high-profile individual, or company/organization.
    • Votes provided they have a sufficiently broad target audience or provably effective controls against vote brigading.
    • Petitions.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service also apply.

Resources on Veganism

A compilation of many vegan resources/sites in a Google spreadsheet:

Here are some documentaries that are recommended to watch if planning to or have recently become vegan:

Vegan Fediverse

Lemmy:

vegantheoryclub.org

lemmy.vg

Mastodon:

veganism.social

Other Vegan Communities

General Vegan Comms

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Circlejerk Comms

[email protected]

[email protected]

Vegan Food / Cooking

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Attribution

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

what...

Why was veganism anywhere near terrorism? Veganism and terrorism do not belong in the same sentence unless "is not" is between them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well you see, if you don't turn veganism into a bogeyman at every turn, you might encourage people to think critically about the merits of veganism and actually try it themselves, and that might challenge the status quo and result in lost profits for the animal agriculture industry.

It's so interesting to me now that veganism is starting to gain an honest-to-goodness foothold in the public consciousness seeing the ridiculous lengths lobbies will go to to try to stop the beginning of the end of their industry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

For the same reasons that abolitionists are always considered insurgents against the states that practice slavery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why was veganism anywhere near terrorism?

probably because of ALF 🤷

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The pamphlet referred to veganism in general, and one out of every 25 people in the UK is vegan. This would be like saying "Hey, better watch out if your coworker starts wearing a hijab", or better yet "Coworker talking about being more environmentally friendly? Probably an eco-terrorist."

It was completely ridiculous. If you're offering what you think is their reason for doing this, then the actual information they put in the pamphlet doesn't reflect that. If you're attempting to justify this, you're off the mark.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

not trying to justify; it sounds, like you wrote, ridiculous.

based on experience, knowing how confused most people are regarding vegetarianism and veganism + flexitarianism, pescetarianism and finally anti-speciesism—i was "offering" confusion, as an explanation, instead of nastiness or bad faith.

this was an interesting article that's later casted to listen: why do people hate vegans?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@merde @owatnext
Wikipedia has a speciesist bias that in some articles is detrimental to veganism and to the movement in general

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who edits Wikipedia fairly prolifically and does have quite a lot of insight into how it works, I'm going to go up to bat for it here: Wikipedia operates on the premise that all information (some exceptions apply for information considered obvious like "2+2 = 4" or "Paris is in France" outside of an article on Paris) must be cited to a reliable source. This means that we can only say what the reliable sources have to say about a subject. As much as possible, we aren't allowed to synthesize from existing material to form a conclusion not explicitly stated in a reliable source. Wikipedia aims to be a tertiary source that captures as best as possible what reliable secondary sources say, interspersing primary sources only as needed and especially as much as possible not personally weighing in. Lastly, we are to provide due weight to viewpoints based on how substantially they're covered in reliable sources.*

It's an unfortunate fact that presently, reliable news sources often tend to be biased against veganism. That's pretty obvious from articles like this that overwhelmingly portray the animal agriculture industry as victimized by an extremist movement, giving only the bare minimum attention to the activists and intercutting their points with "buts". When this is what Wikipedia has to work with, it really isn't their fault. It's a large part of why, for instance, Wikipedia's article on Elon Musk used to fellate him to Mars and back; it was because reliable news sources absolutely constantly treated this man like a supergenius and consistently downplayed the awful things he would do.

If you're able to cite specific articles, I can look into them and see if they fall short of Wikipedia's standards, but ultimately, people need to change before secondary sources will, and secondary sources need to change before Wikipedia can. If you have any specific questions related to the project, I'd be happy to answer; I have pretty extensive experience with policies and guidelines at this point.

(* For instance, if we have an article about a video game that consistently got 7s and 8s from reviewers except for a sole outlier who gave it a 3, we can definitely highlight that 3 as a counterpoint, but we have to consider what proportion of the coverage we give to that review.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@TheTechnician27 I know Wikipedia perfectly well because I edit it in Spanish. My criticism was not against Wikipedia, but against the bias of many people who edit in veganism that has provoked numerous edit wars and heated discussions in the discussion pages. The veganism article itself has been under discussion for years, where some clearly anti-vegan editors have manipulated.
https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganismo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh hey, it's cool to meet a fellow editor out in the wild, especially someone from another language. I will say for what it's worth that I so far haven't run into what I perceive as an anti-vegan bias on the English Wikipedia. Simultaneously, though, I often avoid editing articles specifically about veganism because I recognize I could get heated over what for me is a deeply held ethical belief, so I may just not be where it is if it does exist.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Disgraceful it was there in first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mighty American of you to have put it there, UK.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Prevent stuff is all a bit... Murican