this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
438 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

8318 readers
935 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

German: "There are like...a lot of different ways to say 'the' based on case and gender and you'd better believe most answers you might come up with as a non-native speaker are wrong."

English: "THE is THE!"

Seriously, English has its flaws, but the simplification of article adjectives is one area where it shines.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seriously, English has its flaws, but the simplification of article adjectives is one area where it shines.

When it comes to the articles themselves, it's less that English simplified them and more that it never developed case marks for them. For example, when se→þē split into what's today "the" and "that", that "the" was already invariable.

In contrast, not only German repurposed the demonstrative "der" (that, which, who) into an article in a cleaner way, but it's also dumping most grammatical case info into the article - so it's bound to preserve a lot more forms for them. (It still simplified them a bit though. Compare this with this).

[Sorry for hopping in to nerd out about language.]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it’s less that English simplified them and more that it never developed case marks for them.

Well, Old English baggs to differ. English lost its case markings on articles early on and kept them on nouns a while longer while German kept them on articles and simplified nouns much more early on.

In contrast, not only German repurposed the demonstrative “der” (that, which, who) into an article in a cleaner way

... as did English with "se"/"þē" which started as a demonstrative the same way der/die/das did.

but it’s also dumping most grammatical case info into the article

Again, German didn't dump anything into articles but rather lost it everywhere else.

There is this idea that this fostered the process of using der/die/das much more often (which made it from a demonstrative to an article) but I disagree because it was a widespread process, not only in German but in huge parts of Europe, including beside Romance languages also English were this reasoning doesn't work (as shown above).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, Old English baggs to differ. English lost its case markings on articles early on and kept them on nouns a while longer while German kept them on articles and simplified nouns much more early on.

That is still the determiner, now with an additional function as an article, not an independent article. What I said applies to the article as its own thing, i.e. when "the" and "that" were already independent words - in fact their decoupling is directly tied to the same loss of the endings that caused the morphological case system to go kaboom.

Again, German didn’t dump anything into articles but rather lost it everywhere else.

I'm talking about the informational load, you're talking about the phonetic changes.

There is this idea that this fostered the process of using der/die/das much more often (which made it from a demonstrative to an article) but I disagree because it was a widespread process, not only in German but in huge parts of Europe, including beside Romance languages also English were this reasoning doesn’t work (as shown above).

It's actually both a shift promoted by interactions between languages in the Western European Sprachbund and the result of simple sound changes. Much like a vicious cycle:

  • noun endings get slightly muddier due to syncretism →
  • people rely more on a default word order to convey case →
  • higher usage of demonstratives as "poor man's article" (definiteness might not be the same as topic, but in a pinch it's close enough) →
  • poor man's article becomes an actual article →
  • there's less pressure to keep the noun endings distinct, thus against sound changes that would merge them →
  • noun endings get slightly muddier due to syncretism

Higher usage of demonstratives as articles might be also caused by interference of other languages - that guy spamming "that" and "one" in a language will eventually do the same if speaking some another nearby language. And it also explains roughly why German ended as the exception, as it's right in the middle of the way between "case endings, no articles" Polish and "articles, no case endings" Romance.

Then, in German you got that weird middle ground where word order still conveys topic, but the noun endings already weren't conveying the case any more. The info gets dumped in the article - and that prevents further sound changes and regularisation processes from attacking them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The first thing that comes to mind when I hear "English has flaws" is the spelling. Consequence of being a mongrel language.

I also think it's weird that we say the adjective before the noun, as opposed to, say, Spanish where it's the other way around and you say what the thing is BEFORE describing it. "The white..." "The white what? THE WHITE WHAT??" "...wall." "Oh, okay."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Finnish: "Wait, you guys have articles?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Simplification is great for language learners but an outright flaw for lossy communication. Whenever you lose some part of a sentence through interference (like a movie that decided to have a scene with people whispering at actual whispering intensity) the redundancies help in understanding the correct meaning of the sentence.

Additionally, native speakers of any language (usually) have an intrinsic understanding of more complicated grammar so there is no real advantage in simplification for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

On the other hand having clearer forms allows for more complicated yet accurate sentences (not needed for communication but beautiful).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

𝕯𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖊 𝕶𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖘𝖊𝖐𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖎𝖘𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖓 𝕰𝖎𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕭𝖚𝖓𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖗𝖊𝖕𝖚𝖇𝖑𝖎𝖐 𝕯𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖑𝖆𝖓𝖉

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Me: screaming and weeping beside my father’s tire tread patterned body

Germans: Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen. Sprechen sie Deutsch?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sorry but in France we say "Ouaf" signature look of supériorité

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

German dogs say "Wuff". No idea what "Wöf" is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

French chicken: cot-cot-codet

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's because of Babbel! God is punishing us for our pride and prejudice! /s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You got it all wrong! Babbel is an app to learn other languages, no punishment of any sort.

Just kidding, it's an app to make monkey, not to help people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The cropping:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

How is monke formed

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The smelling each other's butt thing is also way more universal than all the different physical greetings humans have complicated life with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Related to that, the whole physical signalling stuff is quite a mess.

For example there are cultures were waving your head up and down back and forth does not mean "Yes", it means "No".

I found this kind of stuff out when I moved from my homeland, Portugal, to The Netherlands: it turns out the signal for "he/she is crazy" in Portugal is the same as the signal for "he/she is intelligent" in The Netherlands.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"he/she is crazy" in Estonia would be making circles toward your temple with your index finger. What's the gesture in Portugal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that but on the side of the head. It can also be tapping on the side of the head.

The Dutch gesture for intelligent is touching the side of the head with the index finger, which can be confused with the second version of the Portuguese one for crazy.

Mind you, I just realized I'm not sure about those things anymore (I lived for over 2 decades abroad) and had to google to make sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The temple is on the side of the head I thought :) So you have the same gesture as we do I'd think.

Basically it's usually aimed at the part of your head where your chewing muscles are.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I don't know for dogs but I read that other species have different "accents" depending on their group and where they live.

Apparently, animals like dolphins, orcas and whales have different "accents". And birds apparently also sign differently depending on their group and location.

Like, some ducks quack differently, from one region to another. I don't think this can hamper simple communication, but there is apparently variation in their calls.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sprich Deutsch du Hurensohn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Wau wau? 🐕

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

*Sie. No wonder it doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

.uoᴉʇɔǝɹᴉp ǝɯɐs ǝɥʇ uᴉ ʞlɐʇ llɐ ǝʍ ǝɯnssɐ oʇ noʎ ɟo ǝʌɐɹq

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Wau, actually.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Dieser Kommentarbereich ist nun Eigentum det Bundesrepublik Deutschland

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Humans can do body language too.