Yeah, I thought it was pretty ironic that they declared that they wanted to be completely transparent with the public and that they had nothing to hide. They then refused to name the UAP Director. Glad they changed their mind.
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
Definitely poor optics with it. I was wondering if they just hadn't even announced the name internally and wanted to do so first. They seemed so disorganized getting this report going that I wouldn't be surprised if the public announcement of the role wasn't considered.
I agree. Ever since I was a kid, I've always had a ton of respect for NASA and viewed them as the most trusted government agency. However, my naivety sometimes makes me forget that they are, indeed, still a government agency.
Is this a trend? Nasa is incompetent at life streams? There was onea while ago where every kept going wrong and everything seemed disorganized.
It is baffling to see a group that has made scientific breakthroughs fumble on seemingly basic things. They may still function well as a whole, but they don't always present themselves that way.