123
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hackers stole a cryptographic key that let them forge user identities and slip past defenses.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I don't understand how this is not a mainstream news. This could have potentially impacted so many companies and governments... This is huge and it deserves to be widely known. Same hacking technique could have been used elsewhere. It requires a broad investigation

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

I’m with you there. More and more of these companies are shifting from on-premise hosting of their files to the cloud. On-premise required each company to have been breached individually for a bad actor to gain access. Now all of them moving to M365 in the same MS cloud means just a single breach gives access to a nearly bottomless amount of data. Just seems like companies are making short sighted choices for cost reduction over thinking about the potential long-term repercussions for putting their intellectual property and untimely their fates, in the hands of third party.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Just seems like companies are making short sighted choices for cost reduction over thinking about the potential long-term repercussions for putting their intellectual property and untimely their fates, in the hands of third party.

Welcome to late stage capitalism baby! It'll only be a short stay though because these assholes are going to implode the planet looking for their next quick buck.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I swear sometimes it feels like capitalism is the boogeyman behind everything with some people.

This has nothing to do with late stage capitalism and everything to do with how cheap compute is becoming. Fact is that it's just much more convenient to have everything in a managed cloud. You don't need to manage your own servers, take care of maintenance, upgrades, etc. This removes a fuckton of overhead from your organization.

I've been part of on prem to cloud transitions at 3 different companies, and I saw the benefits firsthand. You can replace entire departments, and the contract your signing means you're protected against pretty much any fuckup from the provider's side.

Not to mention, I guarantee Microsoft's cloud is more secure than 99.9% of the server rooms it replaced.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I hear they’re indexing their cloud pricing to rent

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with you.

A company’s core business and skillset is rarely to manage an on-prem IT infrastructure, which is a highly complex endeavor these days. Security most always benefits from being put in the hands of cloud providers such as Microsoft, Amazon, or Google, who can mobilize the best talent and apply economies of scale and modern best practices to cybersecurity across an entire stack.

It also means far fewer liability headaches for the companies that transfer this difficult and onerous responsibility to cloud providers. It’s not even necessarily cheaper to go full cloud; I’ve seen multiple examples where it wasn’t, but the reduction in complexity and liability made common sense. So even the “LaTe-StAgE CaPiTaLiSm!!” claim is just a tired trope at this point.

It’s easy to focus on one publicized exploit of Microsoft’s cloud like this one, and not see the other side of the argument of how many exploits were avoided over the years by not having individual companies manage their own servers. It’s still entirely plausible that the general move to cloud infrastructure since the late 2000s is a net win for cybersecurity in aggregate.

I would also add that whether other cloud customers might be breached simultaneously in the extremely rare event of a cloud-wide exploit is not a consideration when a company decides to move from on-prem to cloud. It’s just a Moloch problem that doesn’t and shouldn’t concern them.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You don’t need to manage your own servers, take care of maintenance, upgrades, etc. This removes a fuckton of overhead from your organization.

...in other words, capitalism is capitalisming.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

These things are inevitable whether you host everything yourself or in the cloud. The latter simply has to be more secure than the former. And it probably is in many cases.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well partly. Microsoft hosts US government data in a separate cloud than the rest of us, but having that get popped is pretty bad with all the FedRAMP security stuff in play.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

ThE ClOuD = u give us money, you give us data, we will let you and every one else access it

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Thankfully I don't do anything Microsoft anymore.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Perhaps you don't personally, but it's very likely your government and companies you interact with do

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
123 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

57904 readers
4656 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS