this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
472 points (89.7% liked)

Memes

45661 readers
935 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Meanwhile I want us to work on things that are actually personally fulfilling, instead of earning imaginary money for rich assholes to abuse and hold us down with.

If we were working on what we wanted to do, we’d do it as much as we had energy for. That might be once a week, or it might be every waking hour for 6+ months.

The important bit is “days per week” would be 0+. This is what I want for everyone. It’s why I fully support a UBI, along with socialized healthcare and housing.

You want to spend your time doing nothing but raise your kids? Great, do that super well and don’t worry about the “lost” income. You want to make art? Awesome, do it! You want to engineer a bridge, teach, be a doctor or nurse, grow crops, etc? We need that too, and in addition to your base UBI money you get extra for doing a socially needed job. Good for you!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I didn't have to work, I'd probably end up doing the same job I am now but for schools and local government, rather than for large companies. And I'd also be doing things like building and maintaining community gardens, or teaching anyone who wanted to learn what I know, because then there's more people to help me out and I can relax more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I’d love to help with community gardening initiatives… sort of.

I’m presently working on an indoor root crop system for urban dwellers, just as a hobby. I don’t actually want to profit off it, I want to develop it to help fix the world, but with the present system, I feel the absolute need to monetize it in some way, which is anathema to how I want to exist and it being low cost and accessible for low income households.

Capitalism hinders progress. It’s really sad and demoralizing.

I’m going to release it for free anyway when it’s done - when it’s a reproducible system and not just an interdependent idea - but it’s never going to benefit me, and that sucks because I’m poor lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could release the ideas and techniques but patent it to protect from commercial theft. then sell licensing and expertise while making it easy for lower income people to utilize what you make.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s something I’ve thought about, as well as making a companion cooking series (recipes to use what you grow sort of thing), or hands-on/ongoing troubleshooting..

I just barely have the energy to make and test the thing in the first place, after years of planning out how to optimize it and testing lesser variations (which means if I get the last iteration balanced, it will work for anyone with minimal input. I’m super irresponsible. I do have a few more responsible testers lined up, however. For reproducibility.) and I definitely don’t know where to go for help that won’t screw me over for a fee I can’t afford 😅

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I love this community. Thank you all for not being cooperate assholea

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

You don't want to collect trash off the streets? Well, looks like our city will look like shit forever. You don't want to work as a cashier? Well, looks like our supermarkets will remain closed.

Most jobs are not fulfilling and would never be done voluntarily (at a relevant scale).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s why they pay above the UBI.

The UBI (universal basic income) is intended to meet basic needs, it’s not intended to give a lavish life. If you want more than the basic, you need to work a bit for it.

What it would do for work is to make it optional and more flexible. If your employer isn’t paying you enough to be there, you don’t keep working there. You find a different job. You have the security to quit with nothing lined up. Because nobody has to be there to meet their basic needs, employers have to actively make you want to work there for your extra wants to be met.

That means maybe a store clerk gets a discount on goods in addition to their flexible hours per week.

But ultimately a shift to UBI plus socialized housing and socialized healthcare would lead to a shift in society such that we don’t have the bullshit jobs we do now, and a lot more people would probably be happy to do menial society supporting labor as part of a rotation. Idk, frankly I’ve met people, they don’t mind doing grunt work if it’s appreciated and valued.

If my bills were paid and I had to cashier or collect trash 2 days a week to keep society running (and for some extra spending, like for electronics or games or whatever) I would totally do so. It’s not my full time occupation, which makes it infinitely more desirable.

I can’t really capture an entire economic shift in one digestible comment, but a lot of stuff would necessarily change to accommodate this shift. It’s not a business as usual proposal, so you can’t really apply a business as usual mindset to it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I think UBI is a good direction for us to head towards as a society, I have a feeling megacorps would just skyjack the prices of pretty much everything to negate the benefits of UBI (look what happened during the pandemic). We would need some kind of legislated regulatory shift as well that would inhibit price gouging just for because there is more money floating through the economy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are probably correct in that racketeering would need to be reigned in, but I don’t really think it’s all that impactful over housing and medical.

We already have what you are using as a worst case, it’s just fully legal and uncontrolled. Rent and medical has been inflating for years for no reason. Because the proletariat can handle it (even though we can’t).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally because they aren't treated with respect in our society, while actively keeping our society functional. Cashier's are Literally in the process of becoming obsolete in our Modern Society. Wake up! Ding dong! Ding Dong!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fwiw, I’d love to see cashiering eliminated as a position. We have the tech for it already and honestly only keep humans doing it because we need to keep human labor up (capitalism and “reasons”).

There is no reason whatever to keep that position huminated (as opposed to automated), other than driving up employment. And maybe reducing loss through theft, but if there was less meaningless junk everywhere that would be less of an issue overall.. plus people wouldn’t be destitute and could pay for it..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Citation needed.

We voluntarily do plenty of distasteful tasks, even without any expectation of a non-economic reward. Lemmy moderation is a salient example.

I've got other gripes about UBI, and especially about pinning the hopes of a "purely voluntary (but with asterisks)" workforce onto it... but there really is no telling how we would behave if we tried this experiment.

For every study suggesting that Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" is actually a legit thing (even though Hardin was later exposed as an academic fraud who fabricated his theory because of his white supremacist, eugenicist political agenda), there is another study suggesting that we're actually historically really, really good at managing commons and that perhaps capitalist framing only gets in the way of the cooperation that we're predisposed toward.

There's even one that came to mind specifically about sanitation workers: https://youtu.be/fe-SZ_FPZew?t=2403

There's also not any evidence that we settled into our modern capitalist model due to any sort of societal optimization. All of the theoretical reasons why an economic abstraction may be an advantage over a social gift economy don't really hold up when you look at historical or contemporaneous accounts of actual gift economies. It seems like the only reason we ended up with this model is because it was advantageous for several waves of wealthy rulers who needed ways to translate their violence-based power into legal power or else lose it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't want to collect trash off the streets? Well, looks like our city will look like shit forever. You don't want to work as a cashier? Well, looks like our supermarkets will remain closed.

Every time I read this I just hear loud licking sounds. bootlicker

How about paying those people enough that they want to do those jobs?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

What is "enough"?

In many countries, your basic needs are already fully met no matter which job you do.

E.g. in Germany working minimum wage full time gets you way more money than you need.

Minimum wage full time gets you about 2160€ before tax, which will be about 1650€ after tax (and healthcare etc.).

You can easily pay for your basic needs for less than half of that (even when living alone). The rest you can use to buy upgrades, like a new phone etc.

Minimum wage workers in Germany are already wealthy.

But of course, if you'd ask the average German minimum wage worker, they'd claim to be poor.

They claim to be poor because they can not afford modern luxury. They can not afford to pay for expensive brands, they can not afford to eat in expensive restaurants.

They can not afford to be lavish.

Now imagine if every person in Germany could afford twice as much (something that happens multiple times in a lifetime). Would they stop considering themselves poor? No, their entitlement would simply rise accordingly (as we've seen again and again throughout the thousands of years of history).

You can not pay people "enough". People do not care about their individual wealth. They only care about how wealthy they are compared to others.

The majority of people can never be wealthy, because people only consider themselves wealthy if they have someone (or rather many) to look down upon.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This does sound pretty cool

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you like what you hear, you should look into, and support, politicians who support a UBI (universal basic income) in your region!

But bear in mind that a UBI alone isn’t enough; because capitalism encourages greed, we also (regardless where you live) need socialized housing so landlords don’t just eat the full entitlement, and socialized healthcare so people can keep themselves healthy to do the things they want without going bankrupt. Those are by far the biggest spends for most people, and if we could get that in check, a UBI is a great equalizer, and could pull millions of households out of the worst of poverty.

It’s good for disabled people, so they can be much more independent, it’s good for retired people, so they can retire without worry, it’s good for parents, so they don’t have to choose between supporting the family and actually raising the family, and it’s good for society as a whole because those “nonproductives” now have economy stimulation power by not being flat broke.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

The days I want to work in a month🖕

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. I want something to do routinely otherwise I'll go crazy. I want to contribute to society's production and do my part. I want to put my time and effort into inventing, creating, and generally making life better for everybody. I don't want to have to do it under threat of starvation, and I damn sure don't want to do it for some asshole who just wants to watch number go up.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Yes, I want to contribute to a project, a product, a group. Every week, and most days of that week.

I don't want to sit around in leisure often, just sometimes.

Be clear, I didn't say I want to further corporate profits, necessarily.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hell yeah! Nothings better than a hard days work and keeping the profit I created. Working is great! Being exploited by corporations is not great, it is bad and why we correlate work with being bad, because we correlate work with being Exploited. It doesnt have to be this way.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

We can discuss semantics all day long (like antiwork vs work reform) but the 4 days week is by no means revolutionary. You do something fulfilling, then the number doesn't count; you have a minde numbing job than any number is too much.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

you like doing stuff, making things, and helping people; not work

Or some combination of these things, and you may even like doing them an amount that most people would consider to be absurd overworking, but hey, you do you

Basically none of us should need to toil like how basically all of us are made to in order for society to meet the needs of the people and keep things turning, keep the lights and wifi on. We could do 2 or 3 days a work easy and be fine, because most of this shit is pointless, could be automated, or is actively unproductive (insurance, etc). 4 isn't the end goal, its an incredibly basic demand, slightly beyond raising the minimum wage, but certainly nothing liberating

Add to that people who really love to work a whole lot and actually get mad if they can't work, will do their things

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

The amount of days the proletariat wants to work in a week is zero, with work abolished and labor becoming life's prime want.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I want to work 7 days a week. But not to make profit for some corporation, but to be an active part in a community (Volunteering in my local maker space)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I don't want to work. I want to do things I would do anyway without getting paid. It's annoying that we have to go through the steps of automating all jobs and then a revolution to get to the phase where this is recognized as the natural way things should go.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Dale didn't take that curve too early, that curve took Dale too early

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

More like 👊

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is this guy and why are there so many memes with him now?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's Dale Earnhardt a NASCAR driver that died in 2001 in a crash while racing.

I don't know why he's popping up in memes now though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Isn't that basically the selling point the pigs used in animal farm before slowly increasing the workload while nobody paid attention

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wish a robot would work my Mondays and Fridays.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If there is hope, it lies with the proles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I just want AI/climate change to wipe us out so evolution can go back to the drawing board.

We aren't happy, the owners aren't happy as they always want more, the natural world and ALL THE OTHER BEINGS THAT LIVE HERE have had our leg pushing down on their throats since industrialization.

Lets just call it, and hope the dolphins evolve into something a little less... fucking terrible.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›