151
Donald Trump turns down second debate with Kamala Harris
(www.bbc.com)
They should still have the debate. Empty podium and all.
Even better, have a fact checker repeat a summarized version of Trump's previous answers to similar questions and then explain why it was a lie.
They should ask the questions to both candidates, and just cut to an empty podium every time it's Trump's turn.
"Mr. President, you have one minute to respond to the Vice President's claims."
crickets
I vote that he's replaced with a slowly melting ice cube.
Come on, we can't replace him with something more competent
I vote that he is replaced with a robot that cracks eggs into a cold pan at a rate of 1 egg every 10 minutes.
Back before the 2016 Conventions, Donnie challenged Bernie Sanders to a debate. Bernie accepted and Trump had to run away from his own challenge. Worse, the event was supposed to raise money for charity...
THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS
The kiffness remix is amazing
At his age he’s probably exhausted, can you blame him?
Best entrenched base wins. Go vote and take your friends.
Because that's what winners do /s
He's confused bc he got spanked really hard and didn't have to pay anyone for it
Trump = big sloppy pussy
Another round of Cheeto Turd basing his whole domestic policy on "THEY ARE EATING OUR PETS" will not help at all.
lil bitch
Bok bok
🐔
🐈
Oh why did something happen
BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for BBC News:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyejk91d2qo
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
151 points (96.9% liked)
politics
18898 readers
3113 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS