this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
240 points (99.2% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
1 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The railroad isn't selling itself as a very safe method of transportation these days.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems almost intentional. Destroy the train system to feed the car industry

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is intentional but you have the wrong reason. Right now all of the class one railroads are trying a business strategy called precision schedule railroading in order to boost their stock prices. The meat and potatoes behind PSR is to lower the railroad's operation ratio as lower as possible by reducing anything that isn't absolutely critical to making the business run. That means cutting your staff to below a skeleton crew level while fighting the FRA to allow for one man crew trains, running extremely long trains even if it literally divides a community, and deferring maintenance unless uncle Sam wants to pitch in. In some extreme cases of PSR some railroads have even gone as far as closing down tracks in sections with multiple main lines.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

How is this shit not illegal?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like the car industry doesn't compete at all with cargo rail. You don't move tons of coal with a semi. That would be astronomically more expensive.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

You should seek out the conspiracy community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a good video on that I'll see if I can find it

Edit: https://youtu.be/qQTjLWIHN74?si=3ma1Z7oppJZw4ktO

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on the definition of safety. Though, it's not unreasonable to consider it as deaths/distance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Planes would still be safer when considering deaths per distance. In 2020, trains had a death rate of 0.03 per 100,000,000 passenger miles, while planes had 0.00095 per 100,000,000 passenger miles.

https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/deaths-by-transportation-mode/

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

All the rail companies are doing at this point is making the case for their shit to get nationalized stronger every single day. This is critical infrastructure, and they’re intentionally running it into the fucking ground.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Not the onion

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like Don Sanders is a hero.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It seems like the issue is that the safety inspector ISN’T saving them any money by catching issues before they’re fined for them. If they were actually ever held accountable for safety issues, his job would pay for itself.

BNSF is absolutely a gilded age-level corporate villain. But no one is coming after them if Don doesn’t find these issues and that’s a problem too. If the rail safety bureau (or whoever manages rail safety) wants to hire him for the same job, I think BNSF would rethink that position VERY quickly.