this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
75 points (96.3% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29024 readers
5 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a new reddit exile, I may be misunderstanding this.

In theory something like a !gaming community could crop up on multiple large instances, especially during the mass exodus while instances are getting hammered with spikes in volume.

If that's the case, we'll have fragmented communities across instances. Is there any way besides subscribing to each of them to combine them into a sort of multi-reddit type aggregation? Or is this considered a temporary (albeit important to adoption) problem during the crazy stages?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

This is that part where people trying to bail on Reddit need to remember that this is NOT Reddit. Lemmy is similar to Reddit but is not designed to replace Reddit as a SINGULAR centralized entity ^hence, yknow, all the decentralized talk.^

If you only want one server, with one set of communities, there are alternatives in the works. If you want to use Lemmy, you need to shift your expectations. The entire point here is that while one c/aww may "win," you can still have your own c/aww on your instance as a completely separate entity that can be ran and moderated differently by different people, and person C can have their own c/aww again independent of the others.

You can follow one, you can follow all, but they remain separate communities on separate instances.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand the idea of keeping them separate and not forcing them to a single instance since that defeats the purpose of decentralization. But from a UI standpoint it would be nice if you could a user could create multi-communities or groups where the content from all the similar subs you put in them show up in a feed. So if say I want to see c/aww I can have a group I created with content from [email protected] and [email protected] and [email protected] etc.

If an instance dissappear or goes rogue and gets defederated that content just dissappear. I don't think that breaks the decentralization idea but solves the user problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Federation is really, really nice for people who can grasp the concept quickly and bend the systems to their will, but its feeling like we may need some sort of intermediary step that allows power users to also help with outside discovery a bit.

Everyone seems to be getting the grasp of local communities easily enough, but being able to participate/pull down content from other sites and discovering them seems to be a big pain point. Lemmy has a better discoverability than most, but whichever sites can figure out how to do good UX for discoverability is gonna get a big leg up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not opposed to some sort of client side conglomeration, but almost every person I'm seeing isn't looking for a tool to use on their own to customize their feed - they want every iteration of a community name automatically congealed into a single community for them to sub to a la Reddit......

Which can't be done without a central authority. Some people argue makinf a new community which scrapes every iteration of a community name automatically, but that's just content theft at that point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

πŸ₯ˆ take my free award. It's yours

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"wholesome"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

tl;dr I'll make my own c/aww with blackjack and hookers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I appreciate how relevant this meme is πŸ˜‚

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly i thought the point of decentralization was purely from a resoures perspective, the idea of it being a bunch of seperate semi isolated communities seems pointless. The strength of link aggregation is in having a breadth of content while allowing content people want to see to rise to the top for ease of access. I've mainly been trying to just see top for the day for all and it seems a bit inconsistent in what it displayed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not pointless, it's just......not Reddit. Decentralization offers a different approach than they do. All the Reddit exiles come seeking a central authority but lemmy exists explicitly to remove that from the equation, that's the entire point of the project. There are people working on single server Reddit clone-ish alternatives that may be more your speed, and that's perfectly fine. Also, for the record, if you want ALL of the c/aww (or whatever) you can just follow every c/aww you come across from 6 different instances, you don't have to pick one and forsake all others.

In regards to your other point, It's also important to remember that the developers of Lemmy consider it to be in alpha IIRC, and the system is currently facing loads they wouldn't have dreamed of a few weeks ago. It's a learning curve for literally everyone involved but the smart techy people behind it all are working hard to flesh out a stable system for everybody to enjoy as they see fit with no central authority.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you can just follow every c/aww you come across from 6 different instances, you don't have to pick one and forsake all others.

That's one of the cons of decentralization. You take the good and the bad.

One of the pros, on that exact same hand, is if you don't like a particular c/aww on a particular instance, you can create your own c/aww on a separate instance and give it the rules you'd like to see in a community where people post cute pictures.

I think the mistake a lot of other newbies are making is believing that this is going to be exactly like Reddit and nothing needs changing ever if we merely build it. No, it's like Reddit, but there are key differences. And you either live with those differences and stick it out until you figure out how it works, you go find another alternative, or you go back to Reddit.

No choice is wrong. Do what works for you.

Coming back to this to say one of the major pros of federation/decentralization is the redundancy will mean you can still get content on Lemmy, even if a particular server goes down. If Reddit goes down, you have to go outside and touch grass. If a Lemmy server goes down, the grass can remain untouched. You'll get content from other instances.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think one point they're trying to make is that it would be nice to have "supercommunities", for example a kind of community that is the aggregated sum of all the individual communities it subscribes to, so for example super/aww that contains c/aww@1, c/aww@2, etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can't reply to the other comment,(my first block maybe?) but I wouldn't hold out hope that Reddit exiles will force the devs to say fuck it and make Lemmy a Reddit clone.

Those are in the works if you want to support those, that's not what Lemmy is for. Don't go to a decentralized platform and demand a central authority. 🀷

EDIT: Downvote harder Reddit stans lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not a reddit clone just because you can aggregate content, that seems like a rather narrow view. The instances could still host their own communities and the supercommunities could exist alongside one another and choose which communities would be part of them, it would just be a functionality that perhaps some users would find helpful. Wouldn't even have to be on Lemmy but for example on kbin or another alternative.

Why is that necessarily a bad thing? Wouldn't it increase the usefulness of federation since it distributes the data but allows for the communities to remain connected to each other? Couldn't you just not partake of that feature if you're opposed to it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's open source, they can code this in eventually for sure. I am not making a fuss. I'm patiently waiting for the very hard working founders of Lemmy to eventually carry out the will of the community.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It'll sort itself out naturally. One will become dominant, and it'll be your link factory

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, the Reddit approach is pretty similar. Reddit had /r/gaming and /r/games, for instance, with the two communities offering pretty much the same content. Same thing with /r/baseball as the large baseball subreddit and /r/MLB as a mostly empty subreddit filled with people who figured baseball would use the same naming convention as /r/NBA or /r/NFL. Eventually, one of the ones wins out. We just have to remember that Lemmy communities have two names before and after the period, so while the initial name can be duplicated, the initial name plus the instance cannot.

It's similar to the early internet where site.com was different from site.org.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This was my first thought. Reddit had both r/DnD and r/DungeonsAndDragons. It was fine

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

/r/me_irl and /r/meirl

/r/hiphopheads and /r/rap

This isn't new

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do I search the various instances?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if there's a better way, but I found this: https://browse.feddit.de/

It crawls most of the instances and lets you search for communities across all of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I like to think of it as a bunch of Discord servers (in a way). Each server is run by the owner / their moderation and can have different channels and rules in said server.

The idea of a "super community" doesnt seem like a bad one, but I'd rather have it be an aggregation of said communities then making it all one thing.

... Like maybe super list of c/aww communities that you can subscribe to at once.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just want to say thanks for this discord analogy. It is way more accurate and effective than that "email" analogy I've been seeing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Doubly awesome - not only can you subscribe to both versions of said /c/aww on (most) any server, you will see the content inline with your normal feed so it's effectively just several versions of the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Had this same complaint/concern but this is a really good explanation of it. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just sub to both if I run into a sublemmy collision where both are sizable. It is a little weird and I'd like to see some clean way to merge them in the future (i.e. with content migration and redirects), but for now it is what it is.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now what we need are concatenated multi-communities where I can have a linkable collection of each of these overlapping subscriptions at multiple federated instances. In RES they were "multi-reddits" and they were my primary way of compartmentalizing and consuming content.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I suggested this in a different thread, but I think it would be cool to be able to create and share feeds surrounding a topic. All the posts from the communities that are included in the feed show up there, and you can share that feed with other people so they don't need to do all the hard work of discovery themselves.

Surely the devs are already looking at something like this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What would you call them?

I know on Kbin instances you can group feed with hashtags, which can group posts, magazines ("communities" on Lemmy), miniblogs under the same feed, and will fetch from other protocols beside Kbin and Lemmy as well. But they're just called "tags"

Here's my brainstorm list for grouped communities from federated instances:

Feeds

Clusters

Slices (slice:lemmings::pod:whales)

Villages

Hamlets

And/or Meta- or Mulit- prefixed to any of these...

Anyways just shouting into the void here lol. Is there a meta thread for Lemmy development? I'm not s developer so I have nothing of substance to add, just a use case to suggest as a user.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I think two communities can live side-by-side and even develop their own culture. With federation, someone subscribed to both essentially has no downside right? I think forcing merges would cause some issues (like, who moderates?).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

reddit also had that a bunch of places, for example /r/gaming /r/games /r/truegaming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd say it's a problem that will solve itself. Beehaw's gaming communities seem to be doing better than Lemmy's, and I'd highly encourage giving them a look. Part of the greatness of the federation system is that we don't have to host EVERYTHING locally (and it's probably not desirable to).

After all, if Lemmy does some stuff really well, and Beehaw does some stuff really well, both of us can thrive together without both sides having to eat hosting costs for double hosting all the content.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beehaw seems to be coming in strong. I almost made an account on their server but for some reason they don't allow downvotes which I feel could be an issue in the future.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might be, but a number of Reddit communities did that via CSS as well and forums before that didn't even have voting systems at all.

Time will tell. Part of the excitement of all this is going to be watching how everything develops

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

beehaw blocks many other instances though. I don't feel like supporting them to grow. Too centralized.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm on Fediverse for few years and reading all the replies here I find it ... sad? Funny? I really don't know what to think of this. It looks like for many people the biggest disadvantage of federation is federation itself ... It feels like people want the centralization and don't want to have options (or rather think about the options)

Or is it an age thing? I'm kind of used to lurk the internet and find what I want. But I can imagine that people raised on f.e. Netflix, Amazon where it's like "BAM! Here you have everything" aren't used to this

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I keep having this image of the owner of a small cottage who has gradually been making his cottage lovely, repairing bits, adding cozy furniture, hanging out with his friends playing his ukulele on the porch.

The huge apartment building down the road burns down, and he invites the huge crowd of refugees into his cottage for shelter. They immediately start complaining that his cottage is too small, it doesn’t have an elevator, how come there’s no exercise room, ewww there’s cat hair on this rocking chair, that color of paint sucks, how could you be so stupid as to have a slow cooker in your kitchen, we need to add on so tell your friends to get off the porch so we can turn it into a sexy new studio…..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then they build their own cottages, and mcmansions, and apartment blocks, along with all the noise and detritus... and now your cozy little cottage is just a house in bustling village

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I work in a space adjacent to change management (ERP implementation) and honestly, be happy and kind. These questions are the absolute default ones of humans attempting to puzzle out a paradigm shift. And the fact they're here and they're feeling loved enough to actually ask for help with their new mental model of it is about eight degrees better than it could have been.

So my answer is: it's just like r/games, r/gaming, r/videogames, r/patientgamers. They are all the same subject matter with overlapping content and userbases, with potentially wildly different moderation biases and groupthinks. And that was all on one centralised Reddit! You subbed to some, or all of them, as you saw fit, you maybe even managed a multireddit to group them! It's just the same here except they're on different instances and soon, enhancements to Lemmy pending, will be just as seamless to manage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's just as simple as:

Most people want the decentralisation perk of not having a single profit driven company controlling everything, and that is where it ends.

Other than that, people would rather just have everything in one place where everyone is, but of course that is antithesis to the whole decentralised model.

People have gotten used to the convenience and ease of the silos, and people don't want that taken away.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it will for the most part sort itself out. I do see this issue has been brought up before but didn't get much traction.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818

I think that something like being able to group communities by topics would help a lot. You could then just sub to all communities that are tagged with the topic, then the fragmentation really doesn't matter nearly as much. Posts would get spread out across communities and instances (which I think is a good thing) but would still have a decent amount of visibility.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm seeing a lot linking other popular similar communities in a pinned post, and honestly I'm preferring it cause you can follow them all - or a more specific 'flavour' of it without getting all the rest. I think the nicest thing to add would be the ability to make a post across communities with features like shared comments and not showing up on the feed twice, so broader topics can still be broadly posed (and not reposted)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I just collect them like candy. Oh, another tech board? Added.

I don't particularly care which community a post comes from. Subbing for me is so I am made aware of their posts. I honestly don't care where it was posted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The lemmy ui could add a way to group communities at the user level. Something like multi reddits.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί