2
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

London Breed did not participate.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Who do you think "won"?

I was impressed with Daniel Lurie. He struck me as a Peter Ueberroth/gets-things-done type.

Mark Farrell says his SF was wonderful and paradise, when he was only mayor for 6 months.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I didn't feel like anyone "won" - Do you?

Mark Ferrell did the most finger pointing. It's a shame London Breed didn't participate because I'd like to hear her goals for another term. I learned more about all of these candidates.

I wish the moderation format would have been that every candidate answered the same question so I could hear clearer comparison of their differences.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Certainly Farrell didn't help himself IMO. His rose tinted glasses about his entire 6 months in office wore thin. He could have given the late Mayor Lee whose 6 years in office he finished some credit at least.

Peskin came across as a total NIMBY, which is what he is.

Safai and, as I said, Lurie impressed me the most, but neither of them have a realistic chance of winning.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

San Francisco

344 readers
18 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS