this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
145 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38978 readers
3268 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The bosses of water companies that pollute waterways could go to prison under a new law the British government says will help clean up the country’s sewage-clogged rivers, lakes and beaches.

A bill introduced in Parliament on Thursday will give regulators the ability to ban bonuses for executives of polluting firms and bring criminal charges against lawbreakers, with the possibility of up to two years’ imprisonment for executives who obstruct investigations.

The state of Britain’s waterways made a stink during the campaign for a July 4 national election. For critics of the Conservative Party that had been in office since 2010, dirty water was a pungent symbol of Britain’s aging infrastructure and the effects of privatization of essential utilities.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Labour literally cleaning up the tories’ mess.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I want every nation in the world to adopt laws like this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

We don't actually need new laws. There are already existing mechanisms for holding the directors of companies criminally responsible for damage and death they cause. Its not new laws we need its the existing ones enforced and done so not just against the water companies but any company that is harming the environment and people or committing other criminal acts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Beware new laws! we already have industry and environmental regulation overlapping with general laws. Lack of enforcement is the problem

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do any of those laws already on the books threaten management with jail time?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Big bosses will do anything to avoid prison ... even follow laws.

That's what prisons achieve in this context.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, i see. build empty prisons as a deterrent to the rich. brilliant! simply brilliant!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Does the UK not have any prisons? Really??

I know they do, so why build any more?? The bosses can do their time in gen pop, just like anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Interestingly, it seems the last government were sitting on a massive prison overcrowding crisis, and there is now talk of sending prisoners to Estonian prisons to ease it.

To be honest, I'd imagine that'd be an even stronger deterrent for these pissbags. I can't imagine an Estonian prison being very accommodating!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Deterrence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

BTW, are we allowed to talk about the national capacity for 60M poopies per day vs the actual load of 90M ?

our birthrate drops. young adults emigrate. some old people die while others retire abroad. And yet, we're 30M poopies/day overcapacity. why? nobody nose! it's a mysteron!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Problems like these are solved by expanding supply. It doesn’t really work to reduce demand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

wait a minute. are we talking gross domestic poopie? or poopie per capita?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This sounds like dogwhistling?

What are you implying.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Do i have to spell it out? it can only mean one thing. they aren't abroad and they aren't dead. Which means they must be underground, kept alive in a coma. their bodies used as orgone-energy batteries to power the quantum thingy. look, i don't have much time. you'll have to trust me... oh no, they can see us. run!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

water bosses

Why is the AP writing as if their audience are children? I understand it from the Mirror.