First photo looks rather unspectacular: https://www.space.com/nasa-solar-sail-space-photo
NASA also has a "spot the diamond in the sky" challenge haha: https://www.space.com/nasa-solar-sail-space-photo
Here's a picture of it while it's still in the shop. https://inspenet.com/en/noticias/nasa-tests-solar-sail-in-solar-in-orbit/
Thankfully for us, the spacecraft that deployed the sail contains four cameras that can capture a panoramic view of both the reflective sail and the accompanying composite booms. The first of the high-resolution imagery is expected to be accessible on Wednesday, Sept. 4.
I can't wait.
Though photons don't have mass, they can force momentum when they hit an object — that's what a solar sail takes advantage of.
Sounds like a bug.
Infinite energy glitch
It’s a feature.
Either way, NASA is already exploiting it. I guess, next they’ll find a way to glitch through the very fabric of the universe to teleport to a distant galaxy without moving at all or even using any energy.
Must be a problem with floating point precision.
Yeah, why do masless particles have momentum? And please not because law X says so.
In short, even though photons have no mass, they still have momentum proportional to their energy, given by the formula p=E/c. Because photons have no mass, all of the momentum of a photon actually comes from its energy and frequency as described by the Planck-Einstein relation E=hf.
From here: https://profoundphysics.com/if-photons-have-no-mass-how-can-they-have-momentum/
Essentially, momentum is a function of energy, not mass. It's just that massive objects have way more momentum than massless ones.
Essentially, momentum is a function of energy, not mass.
Thanks! That's the critical piece of information.
Because they have mass. They don't have "mass at rest", but they are never at rest anyway.
Do you remember that famous E = mc^2 equation? Everything that has energy has mass.
But how do you apply this with Lorentz' transformation (i.e. relativistic factors)? You cannot approach the speed of light without considering relativism. It is known that p = gamma * m * v where p is momentum, gamma is the gamma factor given by sqrt(1/(1 - (v^2/c^2))), m is mass and v is velocity. If you study the gamma factor, you'll realize that it approaches infinite as v approaches c, the speed of light. Since we are actually dealing with light here, where v = c we are breaking the equation. Momentum cannot be defined for any mass which moves at the speed of light. It's asymptotic at that speed.
Also note that the same goes for E = mc^2. At relativistic speeds, also this equation needs to consider the gamma factor. So those classical equations break down for light.
The answer is that photons don't have mass, but they have energy. There is a good explanation a bit further up in this thread on how this is possible.
This NASA video is pretty amazing. I was wondering how they did the booms and they are soft carbon fiber tubes rolled up on spools. I was imagining that you could simply spin the sail and use centrifugal force to expand it.
Maybe someone can answer me this: I've always wondered if a solar sail can only generate momentum away from the sun or if it can be angled to create momentum in other direction. Since the light is reflected and not absorbed, angling it e.g. 45° you change the "momentum" of the photons. That should also change the momentum impacted on the solar sail and spacecraft. Right?
Maybe someone can answer me this: I've always wondered if a solar sail can only generate momentum away from the sun or if it can be angled to create momentum in other direction.
Yeah, 100%. You can totally steer and control your orientation with a solar sail. This is one of the rare actually intuitive things when it comes to spaceflight. (with physics in space It seems like nothing actually works the way you'd expect it to, but this basically does)
We actually have some experience controlling orientation with "solar sails" too. I remember one example of a spacecraft which long after finishing its official mission was left to tumble out of control. Years later, some engineers were able to regain control, use the last of its propellant to counter its tumble and then keep it oriented correctly using only its solar panels as sails, light pressure was carefully controlled to keep the spacecraft oriented.
I could be mistaken, but I believe NASA used the same technique with light pressure to keep Kepler oriented properly as its reaction wheels each failed in sequence.
Haven't heard about the NASA design yet, but JAXA's 2010 IKAROS used "Eighty blocks of LCD panels are embedded in the sail, whose reflectance can be adjusted for attitude contro ".
That's such a badass design, I love it.
A variable thrust and thrust vectoring propulsion system with no moving parts. I doubt that's ever been done before...
I wonder how long it will take to get to Cardassia
I'd be content with Proxima Centauri. But that'll still take a little while.
Indeed. In Deep Space 9, they built one and tried to sail it from Bajor. Got caught in a field of tachyons and ended up at Cardassia. Would essentially be like us making it to Proxima Centauri though.
Yo ho yo ho a pirates life for me!
There is no rum in space
But why is the rum gone?!?
I hope it can be sent somewhere neat once they are done testing. But I assume it’s not configured for long range communication.
It would be cool if it could be sent, slowly, to a “nearby” body.
Iirc, solar sail designs like this can actually go stupid fast when properly propelled by something like a laser array.
What's fun about these is that the mass of the actual vehicle can be much smaller if it doesn't need to carry rocketry and fuel on board. So even though they'll never compete with rockets for power (energy used over a specific length of time), starting at a lighter weight and never running out of fuel means that these systems could theoretically exceed the top speeds (relative to the earth) of our fastest rockets, given enough time.
How do they slow down or stop; is it by reversing the sail?
Won't the sail approach the speed of light if it stays on course in line with the sun for an exceptionally long time?
No, because the solar wind drops off around 100 AU, and the power of the solar wind is going to reduce the farther out you are. These kinds of craft would get much more acceleration from a laser array that can put much more concentrated energy into the sail. But just like the solar wind, it will lose power the farther away from the array it is, along with any kind of intermediary debris attenuating the beam or unfavorable angles between the array and the craft.
So you can get these to an appreciable fraction of the speed of light, but I don't think we'd be able to get anywhere close to c with this kind of a setup.
Edit: I was wrong about the solar wind above, it's only like .5% as powerful as the photons emitted by the sun, and that energy drops off at only 1.5 AU, so they'll get much less energy than I thought without an external power source like a laser array.
I suppose it can't build up enough speed by going in direct line out of the solar system as the falloff would mean there's not enough "runway" so to speak. But I wonder if you could circle the sun and "tack" like a ship does sailing into the wind and build up more momentum that way?
You could have an eccentric orbit that swings far out into the solar system and then when it approaches the sun again accelerates to reach the escape velocity of the sun. But that would take years.
And I think still only be rather slow once it escapes the solar system since the escape velocity would be almost used up.
There is the concept of a nuclear photonic rocket - Wikipedia which I think of as a light sail and a white hot glowing lump of nuclear fuel on a string.
Doesn't "solar wind" refer to the physical particles emitted from the sun? Like hydrogen, helium, etc ejected from the sun's outer layers?
My understanding is that the solar sail is propelled mostly by the photons themselves, not the atomic particles that may also be reaching it.
Of course this probably doesn't change your argument at all, since the intensity of light drops off precipitously as you fly further and further from the sun.
Ramiel?
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll