9
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I happened to click a link that took me to the associated ~~twitter~~ X account for something I was interested in and was greeted by not one, not two, but four modern day web popups.

I know it's nothing new. I've got a couple of firefox plugins that are usually quite good at hiding this sort of nonsense, but I guess they failed me today (or, I shudder to think, there were even more that were blocked, and this is what got through)

What's the worst new/not-signed-in user experience you've encountered recently?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed
(grumble, unblock, reload)

Verify you are human
(click)

...spin...spin......spin...
Verify you are human
(click)

...spin...spin......spin...
Verify you are human
(click)

...spin...spin......spin...
Verify you are human
(click)

...spin...spin......spin...
Verify you are human
(click)

...spin...spin......spin...

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Privacy Pass will generate a number of random nonces that will be used as tokens

British people making a double take

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Privacy Pass just randomly generated Prince Andrew and now my browser is all sweaty.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The web. It was good while it lasted.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

robots.txt is the perfect summary of the web era. A plain text file that politely asked web crawlers not to do certain things. Such an innocent time.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I LOATHE that fucking google sign in overlay.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Gemini is an attempt at trying to bring the old web back, although with some technical limitations.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I heavily disagree with this. Stepping back to "walls of text with hyperlinks" is a bad idea that'll service no one and will never succeed in any reasonable capacity.

Current web technology is not what caused bad web. The exception would be too powerful js where js should only provide interactivity and extra flavor to the page rather than run a full application which can fingerprint and punish user agents.

Javascript, embeded images and audio are awesome things that can improve content readability a thousand fold. Just look at best docs on the web - all of them use these features to tend their users. Even wikipedia added js flavoring like hover pop ups. Because it works.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I actually prefer a mostly text web. If the trade off for ditching JavaScript is not getting hovering pop ups, I'm fine with that. I think that while JavaScript can help with usability, it's main use right now is being a pain in the ass. Images and video are useful, don't get me wrong, and that will always be the most popular "use" of the internet, but most of the time I just want to go on the Internet and read cool shit without fifty different corporations trying to fuck me over with the promise of "enhanced usability". Like a link has to have some floating bullshit for me to click it. Absolute madness.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

For me, multimedia is a non-negotiable part of the web experience.

Yes, I get as annoyed as the next guy when I want, say, a simple tutorial written in a couple paragraphs, but the only ones anyone seem to want to make are eight minute long videos filled with fluff. That sucks. But purposefully excluding it from your protocol because it burned you a fee times is a gross overcorrection in my view.

I appreciate the Gemini project, I respect its goals, and I am happy that it meets the needs of several people such as yourself. But for me, and I think for a great majority of people who would be potentially interested in its broader goal of simplifying the web but are dealbroken by lack of multimedia capabilities, Gemini will never be anything more than a toy. A quirky little curiosity that will never expand beyond a tiny clique of people who accept Gemini for what it is and are content to only ever see content from that same small pool of people.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But lack of ability does not prevent any of that. Entrepreneurs who want to monetize stuff will find a way to spam and game the system.

As someone whos responsible for docs and public facing material I'd never push text only content these days. There's just way too much UX value left out with this limitation. Sometimes more is more.

Additionally I'd argue that people who only want text are have advantage in the current system as you can strip and reformat everything on the front end and nobody will ever know or bully you into accepting their system. Just like nobody cared about ad blockers before they were widely adopted.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Anybody know why google has a popup on every major website now? And more importantly, how to get rid of that without creating an account?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Disable all third party JS in uBlock origin

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

That can cause the page to fail to load in some instances.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Some specific websites might need tweaking but from anecdotal evidence about 90% of websites work just fine. YMMV though because I don't visit twitter

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

A number of the more tech savvy online newspapers have begun enforcing client-side scripts as a means of preventing people from reading articles without a subscription.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

EU: "You can't just collect people's data, you have to ask permission first and give people the opportunity to decline."

Site Developers: "Fine, but we're going to comply in the most malicious manner possible."

HEY DO YOU WANT COOKIES ARE YOU SURE PLEASE HIT THE BIG BLUE BUTTON FOR COOKIES THEY ARE HELPFUL AND GOOD PLEASE GIVE COOKIES!!!!!

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It'd be fun if the EU started policing any use of the phrase "We are required to show this dialog".

They're not. They choose to show that dialog so that they can try to apply commercial tracking cookies. Anything for website function is already covered by EU laws.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

There have been a couple of changes to the rule since it came into effect. Originally, the pop up could effectively occlude the "Do Not Enable Cookies" button behind a maze of "Optional" settings. The end result was a big colorful "I Consent" button and a tiny little gear button with a thousand manual checkboxes to uncheck every time you visited the site.

The regulations were updated since. Now these annoying pop-ups at least tend to have a clearly defined "Yes, I Consent" / "No, I Do Not" at equal scale and opposite color, allowing you to bypass it without going into the weeds on a configuration screen.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58261 readers
4046 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS