this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

shitposting

1579 readers
109 users here now

Rules •1. No Doxxing •2. No TikTok reposts •3. No Harassing •4. Post Gore at your own discretion, Depends if its funny or just gore to be an edgelord.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honest question, why is this not how inflation is measured?

I feel like the basket of goods chosen in Australia is nonsense, considering rent went up by like 50% in two years, and prices in the supermarket have been insane, somehow inflation numbers only ever cracked the high single digits per year.

I haven't looked into it deeper, yet, but seems fishy, and cherry-picked.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think one reason is it's the other way around, the cart is leading the horse. One problem with using a basket of goods to measure inflation is that it cannot keep pace with the substitutions consumers make. Consumer choices can switch really quickly but the basket of goods used to measure that needs to be workshoped before it can be used. It's in part, because it's impossible to have a perfect snapshot of a market.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Could we not at least make various unchanging standards?

Like, housing & food inflation index?

Is that not vague and unchanging enough?

I know sourcing the data isn't a walk in the park, but I know for a fact Victoria collects information on the first one pretty accurately.

I think we should have a "base needs" basket, because that's never going to change. People need to eat, people need to sleep.

Thanks for indulging me in my vague, unlearned on the topic, questioning!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The Big Mac index is indeed a thing, which is surprisingly helpful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This gives a whole, sad new meaning to "i can haz cheezburger"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hate this sort of garbage. Exaggerating or lying to boost an already solid point ruins it as most won't see past the lie. They see the bullshit, turn away, call it all bullshit. Now you've lost my trust and I'm not listening to a damned thing you say.

Big Macs weren't $.50 in 1980, I was there. If they were that cheap, they wouldn't have been able to pry us stoned teenagers out of there.

Big Macs aren't $8 now. I think the whole meal is that much, maybe closer to $9.

Yes, the minimum wage is abysmal, but they're not paying that. Walmart pay $15 to start in this little hick town. McDonald's is probably $13 or so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

A BigMac meal is $12 where I'm at...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A big Mac wasn't .50 in 1980. I remember it being at least $1. The earliest I can find sources for say $1.6 in 1986.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The New York Times previously reported that a Big Mac in New York cost 85 cents back in 1974.

a simple Big Mac cost just $1.60 in 1986, according to The Economist, which introduced its Big Mac Index that same year.

From this article.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That's cool, someone should make that chart hut with food.