Good thing we can't help but cut them all down
UK Nature and Environment
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
This is the opposite conclusion of a recent article that claimed young trees were better at sequestering CO2?
The relevant section of this item is:
Previous experiments have shown that younger trees are able to increase their rates of CO2 absorption, but the assumption has been that more mature forests do not have the same adaptability.
Prof MacKenzie told the BBC it was important for the team to understand how older trees behave as that is the majority of the tree cover we have globally.
According to a clip of Last Week Tonight With John Oliver I saw a while back, there isn't enough free space on the planet to plant enough trees to make an effective difference. I think he was referring to the use of trees alone and no other forms of climate help. (Hopefully)