this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

Furry Writing, Worldbuilding, and Storytime

258 readers
1 users here now

Hello to all furries, welcome to furrywriting. This is a little community to share and discuss stories relating to the furry fandom.

Whether a story about real experiences in the fandom, a fictional story themed around anthrophomorphic animals, or a discussion about worldbuilding for anthrophomorphic animals, all are welcome.


More Information

What to Expect in this Community

You can expect the following contents in this community

  • Fictional stories
  • Discussions about writing
  • Real life experiences within the fandom
  • Discussions about worldbuilding
  • Poetry and other written arts

Post Titles

Post titles should ideally include a short flair about its contents in bracket. For example, if you upload a story, the title should look like this: [Story] The Raccoon's Wish

Here's the list of flairs used in this community:

  • [Story] for fictional stories and worlds.
  • [Writing] for discussions about writing.
  • [Real Life] for sharing real life stories.
  • [Worldbuilding] for posts about furry worldbuilding.
  • [Poetry] for poetries.
  • [Promotional] for promotional contents as mentioned in rule 2 of this community.
  • [Meta] for posts about this community itself.
  • [Other] for posts that doesn't fit the other categories.

Community Rules

  1. Follow pawb.social code of conducts.
  2. Limit the amount of promotional contents
  3. Tag NSFW contents properly
  4. Negative conducts are only allowed in fiction and put content warnings on them
  5. Read the full version of the rules for posting contents made by other people
  6. Avoid posting misinformation and extreme contents

Read more about this community and its rules here

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically, I have a sci-fi world with intelligent animals. The story is that long after humans disappeared from the Earth, animals eventually become intelligent and made their own society to replace them. One major development in their history is that predators and prey agreed to live in harmony, signing treaties, making laws, and generally working very hard to ensure lasting peace between natural enemies.

One aspect of this is of course prosecuting animals that engage in predation. The way criminal trials work in this world is that every animal has the right to be tried by members of their own species or taxonomic group, who are also responsible for carrying out sentencing. Each animal has a taxonomic government to answer to, so if you're a cat you are under the jurisdiction of the Feline government, mouse, Rodent government, bird, Avian government, etc. Each animal follows the same basic laws and regulations that all taxonomic governments agree on, things like prohibiting predation is one of these, but each government can also pass taxon-specific legislation, and are also able to determine criminal penalties independently.

The Felines only had their revolution a few years ago, when they overthrew their old kingdom which was very pro-predation, and made a republic that has signed the Interspecies Peace Agreement and is therefore very anti-predation. Because it's so recent, the Felines also have the harshest punishments for a predation conviction made after the revolution. One count of first degree predation (when you personally kill then eat an animal) is an automatic life in prison without parole, the same penalty as "regular" murder without eating the victim, two or more counts is life in prison unless the prosecution requests for the death penalty at the start of trial and this is authorized by both the judge and the Feline Ministry of Security. Generally, courts stop at two predation convictions even if it's obvious that the defendant committed more, since that's enough to either put them away forever with no chance of parole, or kill them. Second degree predation, AKA simple predation, where you eat already dead animals that someone else killed, is treated much less harshly and sentencing options only has fixed term imprisonment possibly with parole, though with restrictions afterward like you can't work in the government or security-critical industries unless the court lifts those restrictions on a case by case basis. The ISPA lists execution after being convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of a crime that causes the death of two or more other animals as the only exception to the no killing rule, and it can only be done by members of the same species or taxonomic entity, and is also subject to oversight and can even be blocked outright by other ISPA members through the ISPA Inter-Taxon Court, so they also do not have full autonomy on who they can execute, and taxa that have the death penalty much also must make their execution methods (which are mandated to always prioritize minimizing suffering), judicial procedures, and statistics public.

They do also use the threat of execution as a way of getting information about a predation case though. If they catch a Feline who is apart of a predation ring, it's better than nothing but they'd obviously much rather take down the leader and the entire organization. The Feline Ministry of Security can basically tell the accused "Look, your trial date has been set, the prosecution has requested authorization to use the death penalty from us, and you know what evidence they have on you. We're still trying to decide if we want to grant that request. It's up to you and we can't force you to give us any information, but is there anything you want to tell us about your organization or do you want to gamble with whether you'll be found guilty or not?" Funnily enough most of these cats don't care that they're killing sapient prey animals that have lives and families and stories, but break real fast when it's their own life on the line.

The Felines (and any ISPA member for that matter) can also arrest other species if they commit a crime on their territory or against a their own animals, but within the Interspecies Peace Agreement member species, animals have the right to stand trial and receive sentencing by their own species or taxon, so most they can do is investigate the crime, form a case with evidence, and then extradite the defendant back and forward their findings to the government that actually has jurisdiction. Most they can do to a non-Feline is detain them, extradite, and then ban them from Feline territory. However, any ISPA non-signatories, AKA predators that are actually predators and eat prey, who engage in predation, either against any ISPA member species anywhere in the world, or on ISPA territory against any animal; are not granted this right (obviously, since if you extradited them back to their own territory they'd be home free). So if you eat a cat or eat a mouse or bird or any other animal on Feline territory, you are dealt with just like any predatory cat by the Feline government regardless of what the laws by your own taxonomic government is.

I should also add that every animal is intelligent/sapient in this world. So predation really would be like murder. No copouts like eating fish or whatever.

Even in universe this is quite controversial even among prey species so I'm not trying to claim that this is the ideal state of the law, but I'm more trying to make sure if this makes sense or not. I also know that they will almost certainly have very different morals and ethics for humans, but then again I'm writing this story for humans so not sure how relevant that actually is. Is the motivation of having a death penalty despite not even allowing animals to eat meat a realistic one?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm trying, but I can't see how this would be logically different than the current universe we live in. Humans aren't allowed to kill humans, or steal from humans, or in some cases even insult humans if it would damage them. And yet, we still have places that not only have the death penalty, but some are proud of it. The question of "what to do with murderers" isn't a relatively new one, and it's something that's been explored and come out with answers both in favor for and against the death penalty. Ethically, we could probably spend a lot of time whether or not this fictional government would view the death penalty as too far, but just in terms of them realistically having it, it seems like a no-brainer that it could exist, even if a majority of the populace is in favor of abolishing it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Generally, and in some cases unfortunately, murders aren't just weighed based on whether someone dies but also the motive and how it relates to the victim.

One could argue that preys generally don't deserve to die in the hands of predators since they don't do anything wrong besides existing, but predators who kill others deserve to die as punishments because they've taken another lives. It's basically the same concept as a human society that still has death penalty.

Whether it's ethical or sensical to have death penalty in a world where predation is outlawed is as hard of a question as the question about death penalty in real life.