this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
38 points (69.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Voters thought the faltering president was too old, but allies looked the other way, advisers defended his abilities and the Democratic Party boxed out other candidates

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/8nX8l

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How?

Well - he started old, and as one does, got older.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s very easy to say in hindsight, you can’t really predict that sort of thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

This but seriously, as there is a high chance you'll die at that age.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This article is like 10 days old but feels like it's about a year out of date already. What a whirlwind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It truly does feel like it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

DNC putting their whole ass on the scale for candidates?

1745

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least they pivoted before we got locked in with a horrible candidate. Unlike last time, Hilary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I truly believe this was calculated. It never would have happened if they didn’t schedule that debate so early. Imagine this happening mid September.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Calculated, but epically backfired. The point of the early debate was to nip all the 'too old to run' discourse in the bud, but it did precisely the opposite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I just think the opposite. I think the people in charge knew he shouldn’t run because of his age. There was a report that Obama and George Clooney had serious concerns after some fund raiser which led to Clooney writing that op ed after the debate.

If he gave Obama and Clooney concerns, I guarantee there were more people before that that had concerns.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Epic Miscalculation

Maybe it was 11 dimensional chess.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

Wall Street Journal Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Wall Street Journal Bias: Right-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.